Tag Archives: JFK

Ex-Chief Of Mossad Says World Better Not Pry Into Who They Assassinate And Pull Trigger On


World better not pry into how we decide to pull trigger on someone – ex-chief of Mossad

By Jim W. Dean, Managing Editor Veterans Today

Ex-Mossad Efraim Halevy
Ex-Mossad Efraim Halevy

… from Russia Today, Moscow

[ Editor’s Note: It’s always a treat to get an interview with these ex-Mossad chief’s as they have a history of being very outspoken, which we rarely see among the Western ones. The only thing we get better than this is something like the rare gem The Gatekeepers amazing documentary where the filmmaker Dror Moreh got the ex-Shin Bet heads to interview about their handling the occupation with its stunning revelations.

At VT we sometimes have had personal contacts at this level, but not the freedom to make films about them or print interviews, so we like to share what we find that has been, where you get to read gems like this:

“I mean that intelligence is not a science. I believe that intelligence is an art, and therefore, just as there’s no orderly way to paint a picture, so there’s no orderly way to carry out intelligence, because every intelligence operation is an operation in itself, and one operation does not compare or is similar to any other.”… Jim W. Dean ]

____________

– First published … December 19, 2016 –

In a world where terrorism can strike at any moment – where terrorists resort to stabbing, ramming attacks, and mass shooting – no one is safe from the threat of extremism. Recent terrorist attacks in Europe highlight the need to ramp up security – and many are pointing to Israel as a model. Surrounded by hostile countries and conflict zones, Israel has managed to contain the extremist threat.

The Israeli Mossad is one of planet’s top intelligence agencies and is known for its relentless pursuit of terrorists. How does Israel’s mighty intelligence apparatus work against terrorism? How can peace be kept in a country where the enemy is waiting around every corner? We lift the lid on the counter-terrorism methods used by one of the world’s top spy agencies with a former director of the Mossad – Efraim Halevy.

Sophie Shevardnadze: Efraim Halevy, the former director of Israel’s powerful intelligence agency, the Mossad, ex-head of Israel’s National Security Council – welcome to the show, it’s really great to have you with us. Now, Mr. Halevy you say there’s no such thing as an orderly way to carry out intelligence. Does this mean there’s no laws, no rules of conduct for intelligence gathering?

Efraim Halevy: Intelligence is one of the oldest professions in the world, but there’s no law book concerning intelligence, there are no agreed rules on intelligence, and despite that, intelligence is a main player in the international relations and in domestic relations.

SS: Yeah, but okay, but when you say there’s no such thing as an orderly way to carry out intelligence – what exactly do you mean?

EH: I mean that intelligence is not a science. I believe that intelligence is an art, and therefore, just as there’s no orderly way to paint a picture, so there’s no orderly way to carry out intelligence, because every intelligence operation is an operation in itself, and one operation does not compare or is similar to any other.

SS:How does intelligence gathering against terrorism work? Are terrorist groups being infiltrated, are undercover agents working among terrorists?

EH: All of the methods used by the intelligence over the years are employed. Most certainly, you have agents undercover, most certainly you have electronic intelligence with all of the new developments in that field. Every element that you have in modern day information technology is used and is employed in intelligence. By the way, not only by intelligence agencies, but also by groups like ISIS and Hezbollah.

SS:You know, I’m particularly interested in undercover agent work. How do you gain the trust of a radical group? I mean, it must be hard to infiltrate IS, for example.

EH: I’m sure it is difficult to infiltrate the Islamic State, but there you’re going to question their motivation. What motivates somebody who is in the Islamic State to cooperate? And I should imagine, probably, the major motivation is disgust with the methodology used by the Islamic State, not only in treating its enemies, but also treating some of its own people.

SS:So, are you saying that people that are part of the Islamic State are appalled by their own methods, but they can’t leave because if they leave they are going to die? So, they choose to cooperate?

EH: I believe, that, probably – I am only surmising, I’ve not been there for quite some time, so I can only surmise – I believe that many of the people who cooperate, cooperate because they’re unable to leave and, on the other hand, they feel that they are not of their own will involved in the big effort of…shall we say, of evil, which has to be overcome – and they want to contribute their part to this.

SS:Alright, so I get your first point: in order to infiltrate an organisation like ISIS you’ve got to find someone who is appalled by their own methods – but once you infiltrate, if your undercover agent gains the trust, right, of the terrorist cell – will he have to do as the others do? For example, I don’t know, behead someone? Is this expected of the agent?

EH: I think I cannot give an exact answer to that, and I don’t believe anybody has the right answer to that. But I believe that in the end, in order to achieve the ultimate aim, sometimes, along the way, we have to do things which normally we would not like to do.

SS: The intelligence has helped curb the amount of bombings that are happening in Israel, but what’s the use of it when people resort to stabbings or drive-by shootings?

EH: I believe – and it’s my personal view – that it’s wrong to call stabbings “terrorism”. I believe, terrorism is something more organized, is part of a larger movement. Stabbings and similar events are individual reactions to what is happening and what is perceived in one way or another as threatening the fabric and society, of the people who are doing the stabbings, and therefore they carry it out. The general word, the general term of “terrorism”, although it’s applied to that, is not a terrorism which can be codified like organisations like ISIS or organisation like Hamas or organisation like Hezbollah.

SS: How can such attackers with no formal ties to any terrorist groups be caught before they act?

EH: It is a serious problem. I think no formula has been found for that and therefore, an individual who decides on his own to carry out a terrorist act, if he’s careful and if he knows how to operate, most probably, will be able to arrive on the scene. But there are a lot of methods and ways of monitoring central areas, main highways, transportation systems and so forth, so sometimes you catch these people as they are on their way.

SS: You’ve seen Mossad operate abroad, doing “normal” intelligence work like spying, surveillance – but also undertakes targeted assassinations of terrorist leaders. How do you decide when to pull the trigger on someone? When is enough enough for Mossad?

EH: I don’t personally wish to go into this field of when we make a decision to remove somebody to a better world. I think, the international society would be better served by not prying into this unnecessarily. You will not find, I believe, any intelligence officer, either side of the divide in this world of ours, who will want to talk about it, and I want to keep my hands clean on that. As I said, I don’t want to say that we make such decisions – I don’t want to go into the details of how we decide, how we carry out operations, which operations are carried out, which are not. I think, it would be better for the peace and tranquility of the international society to leave these questions unanswered.

SS: Sure. America looks to use drones when taking out terrorists. Does Mossad uses drones too, or it only works the old fashioned way, with agents on the ground?

EH: Mossad has all the means and all the methodologies which are used in intelligence in modern day life. Mossad is at the forefront of the technology, in all the fields that you can think of, and I think that Mossad has done extremely well in developing some of the more advanced types of weaponry and systems which carry weaponry.

SS: When one of Mossad’s most infamous operations – the attempted assassination of Hamas leader Khaled Mashal went wrong – you played an active part in regulating the situation after. Two Mossad agents were captured and Israel managed to get them back. If an operation like that backfires, does Mossad try and get its agents back at all costs?

EH: The word “all costs”, I think, is not the right term to use. It is true that I’ve played a very central role in solving the problem which arose as a result of an operation which did not reach successful conclusion in 1997, and in that area, I performed the role of a special emissary, action on behalf of the Prime Minister of Israel at a time, who was Mr. Netanyahu in his first term, and I did not wish to reach a point in which “all costs” are paid in order to get the result. I think we had to get a result which would make it a win-win situation, in other words, when both we and those who have been wronged by us, would emerge from the situation with a feeling and a public aura of having been successful.

SS:Mossad is known to go after perpetrators of terrorist attacks anywhere they escape – Mossad’s special unit, the Kidon, is responsible for that – this tactic may work for revenge, but does it deter terrorists from striking again?

EH: Look, I don’t want to talk about deterrence, because in the end, let us be frank with ourselves – we have not reached a point in which we can say that actions we have taken have ‘deterred terrorism’. I think that the word “deterrence” is a word, or a theme which should be forgotten in dealing with these matters. What we can do is to destroy capabilities, what we can do is to get the other side to realize that the pain of continuing what they’re doing would be insufferable for them. If that is called a deterrence, then yes, deterrence. But if you look at things in the Middle East, if you look at the way the relations of Israel and its neighbors have revolved on terrorism – when it comes to organized terrorism, I am not talking about small groups, organized terrorism, like Hezbollah, like Hamas – what we have achieved, is, I think, a mutual deterrence and not just deterrence.

SS:But, in order to stop a terrorist you need to put fear in him – how do you put fear in people who are willing to blow themselves up?

EH: I think, the use of the term “fear” is misplaced. We don’t want to get the other side to fear, we want the other side to take a logical approach, which leads it to the conclusion that the price that would be paid is not a price which they would wish to pay. In other words, we have to make the price such that the other side does not think it’s worth its while to pay it.

SS:Are cyber warfare tools part of Mossad arsenal? Like trojan worms, viruses, etc?

EH: I’m not permitted to refer to any specific means that is in our arsenal. I’m sorry, I know it’s interesting, but I cannot relate to that.

SS:It truly is. Just tell me in general – do cyber tools make spying easier? Or the amount of information to process it is just too big to manage?

EH: There’s nothing too big to manage, and I don’t want to go into details of the cyber warfare – it is something which is being, I think, used, and exploited around the world, and this is something which a great threat to international security in the end – because, once you begin a major confrontation in the cyber field, the penalty for all those players who will be involved in it would be enormous.

SS:Now, it’s no secret that Mossad recruits some of its agents online – you can fill out an application form on the web site. You were the first one to institute this practice, like you’ve said – how does this process work? If you like a candidate you do just invite him over for an interview? How successful has been recruitment process for agents?

EH: First of all, let me say, you are right, I was the first one who put Mossad on the Net, and there was enormous opposition to that in the Mossad, people thought that I was doing the wrong thing. Now, of course, you cannot imagine without it. Obviously, this is only a first step in recruiting somebody, it’s a method of casting net as wide as possible, and once you reach a stage in which you want to actually decide whether to recruit somebody or not, you don’t do it by correspondence, you do it by face-to-face contact.

SS:But, who do you pull in more – people from the web or just people that you see in the streets and you approach them?

EH: I don’t know, and I don’t think any statistics are drawn up in this field. I think we recruit people from all ways of getting it to people, all methods of communication, and in the end, we have as wide as possible choice as one can hope for.

SS:Social media like Facebook and Twitter, they have turned into a platform for terrorists to incite violence. They spread radical ideas and exchange plans. Is this cyber-terrorism the world is facing a new kind and will it be in the future?

EH: It’s not the future, I think it is the present – and yes, one of the things we have to take into account is that the terrorist groups use these methods and these tools for their own vile deeds. I can tell you that without the use of Internet, the attack on the U.S. on 9/11 would not have been possible. This all was organized through IT means and methods, and the road from that to other ways of carrying out warfare, like cyber warfare and so forth, are at a disposal of terrorist groups, and they have used it in some areas, some cases, almost to perfection.

SS: ‘Lone-wolf’ terrorist attacks – when people act on their own, without the assistance of a group but inspired a radical ideology – they are becoming more frequent, you’ve faced them in Israel and Europe has witnessed a whole series of such attacks over the past year. Is there a direct link between online incitement and lone wolf attacks? Since the internet provides easy and fast access to radical ideas..

EH: It would not be useful to attribute too much to the methodology. What we’re witnessing in the XXI century is widespread understanding that individuals and small groups can use the means at a disposal of states and of state organs, no less than the state organs. That is something which is troubling, and that is one of the aspects that people have to take into account when they’re putting together means of preventing penetration and ways and means of sabotaging the capabilities of intelligence and state organs all around the world.

SS:Can social media actually help uncover terrorist plots or find potential terrorists through tracing of their online activity? Are there special intelligence units monitoring online interactions?

EH: Without going to any details and I will not do that, I believe that the only way to give sufficient protection in this world of XXI century is to try and to cover all ways and means of IT traffic. Now, this is something, of course, which is enormous, because every year, it increases exponentially. So you have to have ways and means of prioritizing what you’re doing and to be able to get to what you need in orderly and in a scientific way – this is an enormous challenge and I think that intelligence and other security agencies all around the world are devoting a lot of effort to try and to find ways and means of prioritizing what they’re doing so that they would get to what they need to get.

SS: The Knesset has recently adopted an anti-terror bill, giving sweeping surveillance powers to security forces. Now in a democratic state, the right not to be searched, spied on, arrested at will is fundamental – but in the face of terrorism what’s a way out of this democratic dilemma?

EH: What has to be clear is that in this state that we’re at the moment, until the international climate changes, international social behaviour changes, we will have to be careful in the degree of freedom which social and other nets are allowed to operate. There’s no way of otherwise doing this. There’s a clash between those who wish to have an entirely liberal system of life, way of life, and those who understand that in order to be able to protect societies and states effectively you have to have, at least temporarily, capability of covering certain types of activities with means which were not used until recently.

SS:In Israel there are checkpoints in every gate in every town, security is tight everywhere, yet you move around the big cities without much delay, and the measures aren’t annoying or too constraining. How do you do it?

EH: First of all, I invite you to visit Israel – you will come to major cities and will not notice checkpoints on every street, on every corner…



SS: That is exactly my question – how do you do it? I know there are checkpoints but we don’t notice them.

EH: How do we do it… I won’t say that there are checkpoints but you don’t notice them – there are no checkpoints, period. It’s not checkpoints you don’t notice… there are other means of surveilling areas – there’s electronic surveillance, there’s photographic surveillance – various means of surveillance, and this allows people of Israel to conduct their way of life without any real restriction. Therefore, if you come to the cities, like in Tel-Aviv, from which I’m broadcasting now, or in Jerusalem, even, where there’s more tension, or in other cities throughout the country, you will not find an immediate presence and the sense of a presence of a security capability which covers everything. It s done in a more discreet way, and it is very effective.

SS:Western states today are facing the kind of terrorism Israel has been living with for decades. Is the constant threat of terrorism a new normal for the West?

EH: I think the threat of terrorism is not only a threat to the West, it’s a threat to all over. There have been terrorist attacks in other areas of the world, including Eastern Europe, including Russia. Russia has also experienced terrorism in recent years. I remember when I was head of the Mossad there was a major terrorist attack on a theater in Moscow – and this was a very-very highly reported event. So terrorism is like a disease, it cannot be restricted by borders and geography – therefore, I think, there’s a growing understanding, that in order to be able to deal with this, the more genuine cooperation can be achieved, everybody will benefit, all sides will benefit from such a cooperation.

SS:EU’s migrant crisis is making it more vulnerable to terrorism – a Syrian refugee was arrested in Germany in October for planning a major terrorist attack. Now Israel accepts almost no refugees – is that the only way to ensure public safety isn’t compromised?

EH:The reason we do not receive refugees is… we are a country which was born as a result of major international events and had to absorb hundreds of thousands of millions of our own people who were scattered around the world and therefore, we are not in a position to receive large numbers of refugees.

SS: Yeah, but my question really was – should we not accept refugees anywhere if we want no terrorism on grounds of our country? I am talking about refugees from war-torn countries, like Syria, Libya.

EH:I think you have to be very careful in going through a system of finding out whether there are no infiltrations of terrorists in this way, as well. There has to be a method to do this, and I think it has be deemed in quantity.

SS: Alright, Mr. Halevy, thank you very much for this interesting interview, for this insight that you gave us. We were talking to Efraim Halevy, the former director of Mossad and also the former head of the Israeli National Security Council, discussing Israel’s counter-terror expertise and how it can help the fight against terrorism across the world. That’s it for this edition of SophieCo, I will see you next time. Read More

Related Articles

Mordechai Vanunu and Michael Collins Piper Converge:

 The Israeli Mossad Assassinated JFK

by Mark Dankof

The American news media, for all the usual and most obvious reasons, has systematically ignored the most explosive news story in years, made all the more relevant by the countdown to further conflict in the Middle East as credible rumors continue to surface that Israel and the United States are planning an act of preemptive war against Iran in coming months.

The story, which appeared in the Express Newspapers of India on Monday, July 26th, quotes Israeli nuclear whistleblower Mordecai Vanunu as crediting the Israeli Mossad with the assassination of President Kennedy. Even more incredibly, Vanunu states specifically that the motive for the assassination of Kennedy on the part of the Israeli government was related to the American President’s insistence that the Zionist State come clean about its nuclear program at the infamous Dimona plant in the Negev desert.

Vanunu was released by the Israeli authorities in April after 18 years imprisonment for a treason conviction related to the disclosure of state secrets regarding the Israelis’ nuclear program. His sensational public charge about the involvement of the Mossad in the Kennedy murder might simply be relegated to the realm of the utterances of a disgruntled or imbalanced man, except for one additional item.

Michael Collins Piper, the author of Final Judgment: The Missing Link in the JFK Assassination Conspiracy, has made a previous case for Israel’s direct involvement in the Dealey Plaza murder of John Kennedy on November 22, 1963 that is both plausible and compelling. The Vanunu account simply underscores and corroborates the case Piper made originally over a decade ago. The converging accounts of the two men are most disturbing.

Piper tells the reader of Final Judgment that 1963 proved to be a pivotal year in a publicly unreported conflict between America’s 35th President and Israeli Prime Minister David Ben Gurion, principally over Israel’s failure to submit its Dimona operation to International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspection, and secondarily to a negotiated settlement with the Palestinians. He subsequently proceeds to discuss the principle alleged players in the assassination plot itself in a way which corroborates the research of such respected Kennedy assassination scholars as the UK’s Anthony Summers and University of Texas professor Jim Marrs. Readers of the work of Summers and Marrs will be intimately familiar with names like Sam Giancana, Johnny Roselli, Carlos Marcello, Guy Banister, William Harvey, William Sullivan, George de Mohrenschildt, James Jesus Angleton, Richard Helms, Alpha 66, and Santos Trafficante. Typically, the demonstrated links of these individuals with organized crime syndicates, the anti-Castro Cuban exilic community of the early 1960s, and an element of the Central Intelligence Agency involved with the first two groups, has resulted in past tentative conclusions that the crux of the plot that took Mr. Kennedy’s life involved a convergence of interest of these three (3) key constituencies involved in a sordid triumvirate deliberately concealed from the American public 40 years ago by the Warren Commission.

Piper does not discredit this conclusion reached by his predecessors in their research of the circumstances that led specific individuals to participate in a plot to kill the President. He simply demonstrates what has been hidden from view before now: that those fingered by the meticulous academic research of Summers, Marrs, and others, have even deeper demonstrable associations with the Israeli lobby and Israeli intelligence.

Final Judgment’s case in this regard is principally built on the key significance of Meyer Lansky as the real power player in American organized crime in the 1950s and 1960s, the superior of Giancana, Roselli, Marcello, Mickey Cohen, Mickey Weiner, Moe Dalitz, Frank Costello, and others previously mentioned as participants in the Kennedy conspiracy. In turn, Lansky’s role as a committed Zionist and fund-raiser for the State of Israel involved direct, palpable links between his criminal empire, his Miami-based banks, and the Banque de Credit International (BCI) in Geneva, Switzerland. This latter entity served as the European-based money laundering center for Mr. Lansky’s global activities. BCI in turn, was headed up by an Israeli banker, Tibor Rosenbaum, former Director for Finances and Supply for the Israeli Mossad. Piper then demonstrates that BCI was a chief share holder in a Rome-based corporation called CMC/Permindex, whose chairman of the board was none other than Louis M. Bloomfield of Montreal, Canada, a major fund-raiser for Israel and known asset for Israeli intelligence. CMC/Permindex, in turn, proves to be a major point of intersection which brings the shadowy Bloomfield into direct or indirect contact with Clay Shaw (the chief target of the Jim Garrison JFK investigation in New Orleans), Guy Banister, James Jesus Angleton, FBI Division 5 chief William Sullivan (who spearheaded the FBI investigation for the Warren Commission and served as FBI liaison and friend of Angleton), ex-Cuban President Carlos Prio Socarras (provable gun-running business partner of Oswald assassin Jack Ruby), Ernest Israel Japhet (chairman and president of Israeli Bank Leumi), Shaul Eisenberg (a key figure in Israel’s nuclear bomb development and participant with Rosenbaum in the Swiss-Israel Trade Bank), elements of the French nationalist Secret Army Organization (OAS), CIA agent Theodore Shackley (the CIA’s chief of station in Miami during the CIA-Lansky assassination plots against Fidel Castro), and Abe Feinberg, New York Jewish businessman used by Ben Gurion as the liaison for secret meetings with President Kennedy to resolve the dispute of the latter two over Dimona. It is thus the BCI and CMC/Permindex players and links which Piper employs to show that the players, alliances, and assets were firmly in place to bring those with motive, means, and opportunity together in a plot which culminated in Dallas.

Secondarily, Piper buttresses his case by showing the results for Israel subsequent to the tragedy in Dallas in November of 1963. The removal of Kennedy brought an end to American demands for IAEA inspections of the Israeli nuclear program, and the ascension to the White House of Lyndon Johnson, whose long ties to Meyer Lansky and Carlos Marcello had assisted the barefoot boy of the Texas Hill Country in his arrival at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. More significantly, Johnson’s arrival in the Oval Office represented a sea change in American Middle Eastern policy, establishing for Piper the Israel-First direction of every American Chief Executive from LBJ onward, to the detriment of the independence of the American government from the undue influence of the Israeli lobby, the maintenance of regional peace and stability in the most dangerous area of the globe, and any vestiges of hope for positive American political relationships with the Islamic world.

The Vanunu-Piper allegations about Israel will not go away. The revelations of direct Israeli connections to key members of the Neo-Conservative foreign policy team of George W. Bush most desirous of conflict with Iraq; the virtual ownership of the United States Congress by the American-Israeli Political Action Committee (AIPAC); and the sycophancy of John Kerry toward these same interests, will culminate in a political boiling point in the United States if an expanded American involvement in a Middle Eastern war, the re-institution of an American Draft, and further instances of Middle East-related terrorism in the American homeland end up being connected by the public to the interests of Israel and Zionism and not those of the United States. Further exposure and corroboration of the Vanunu-Piper charges that the Israeli government was the driving force behind the death of John F. Kennedy–in conjunction with further exposure of Tel Aviv’s ongoing manipulation of the American government and media in issues of War and Empire–will commence a mass revolt against the policy elites that neither Tel Aviv nor Washington will be able to contain or control.

Between now and the first Tuesday in November, the policy elites will do their best to conceal fair disclosure and debate over who controls the present process and benefits by it. Suppression of information will be their modus operandi. Bush, Kerry, and their respective pals in Corporate America and Big Media will do their best to obfuscate the truth, ignore the discussion of the core issues of War and Peace, and hide the real identity of their financiers and handlers through such information suppression. Suppressing any serious examination or dissemination of the Vanunu-Piper case against Israel is already a done deal. It is a real shame. Pity us, the “free” American Republic, that no one will ask our two Presidential aspirants some pressing questions in the days ahead, including what they think of the following Presidential document from 41 years ago.

July 5, 1963

Dear Mr. Prime Minister (Levi Eshkol of Israel):

It gives me great personal pleasure to extend congratulations as you assume your responsibilities as Prime Minister of Israel. You have our friendship and best wishes in your new tasks. It is on one of these that I am writing you at this time.

You are aware, I am sure, of the exchange which I had with Prime Minister Ben-Gurion concerning American visits [i.e.: inspections] to Israel’s nuclear facility at Dimona. Most recently, the Prime Minister wrote to me on May 27th. His words reflected a most intense personal consideration of a problem that I know is not easy for your Government, as it is not for mine. We welcomed the former Prime Minister’s strong reaffirmation that Dimona will be devoted exclusively to peaceful purposes and the reaffirmation also of Israel’s willingness to permit periodic visits [inspections] to Dimona.

I regret having to add to your burdens so soon after your assumption of office, but I feel the crucial importance of this problem necessitates my taking up with you at this early date certain further considerations, arising out of Mr. Ben-Gurion’s May 27th letter, as to the nature and scheduling of such visits.

I am sure you will agree that these visits should be nearly as possible in accord with international standards, thereby resolving all doubts as to the peaceful intent of the Dimona project. As I wrote Mr. Ben-Gurion, this Government’s commitment to and support of Israel could be seriously jeopardized if it should be thought that we were unable to obtain reliable information on a subject as vital to the peace as the question of Israel’s effort in the nuclear field.

Therefore, I asked our scientists to review the alternative schedules of visits we and you had proposed. If Israel’s purposes are to be clear beyond reasonable doubt, I believe that the schedule which would best serve our common purposes would be a visit early this summer, another visit in June 1964, and thereafter at intervals of six months. I am sure that such a schedule should not cause you any more difficulty than that which Mr. Ben-Gurion proposed in his May 27th letter. It would be essential, and I understand that Mr. Ben-Gurion’s letter was in accord with this, that our scientists have access to all areas of the Dimona site and to any related part of the complex, such as fuel fabrication facilities or plutonium separation plant, and that sufficient time be allotted for a thorough examination.

Knowing that you fully appreciate the truly vital significance of this matter to the future well-being of Israel, to the United States, and internationally, I am sure our carefully considered request will have your most sympathetic attention.

Sincerely,

 

John F. Kennedy

Assassination Of President McKinley Was By Jews!

By Brother Nathanael Kapner – Why I Left Judaism

THE JEWISH HOUSE OF ROTHSCHILD  had lost a fierce battle with President Jackson with regard to keeping their Central Bank. For in 1834, Jackson removed all government deposits from the Rothschild’s “Second Bank of the United States.” 

A new System of National Banks was established in 1862 eliminating the Jew-controlledCentral Bank up through 1901. It was on September 6 1901 that President William McKinley was assassinated through the intrigues of the Rothschilds and their hit-men.

With McKinley out of the way, the path to the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was easily paved through the pawns of Jewish agents of the House of Rothschild. Two such Rothschild agents were the powerful Jewish bankers Jacob Schiff and Max Warburg.

President William McKinley was known as a “hard money” man. This was because he advocated a gold standard. Unlike his opponent, William Jennings Bryan, McKinley was against “easy money” with no backing — printed by Jewish lenders at interest to the borrower – namely the US government. This was the essence of McKinley’s 1896 & 1900 successful campaign against William Jennings Bryan who advocated for “free and unlimited coinage of silver.”

BUT BY McKINLEY FIGHTING AGAINST “easy money,” (translate Jew-coined & printed-at-interest money) McKinley sealed his death warrant. A death warrant signed, sealed, and delivered by the powerful House Of Rothschild, criminals in bankers’ suits.

THE ROOSEVELT-JEWISH CONNECTION
THE NEW YORK JEWISH CROWD WANTED Theodore “Teddy” Roosevelt to be President. The Roosevelts were a wealthy group of NY socialites. Theodore Roosevelt Sr. (”Teddy” Roosevelt’s father) inherited the multi-million dollar family business, “Roosevelt & Son,” importers of plate glass. 

Through his many Jewish business connections, Theodore Roosevelt Sr. founded the Metropolitan Museum of Art, the American Museum of Natural History, and the New York Children’s Orthopedic Hospital. All of these institutions were and are Jew-intensive.

Theodore “Teddy” Roosevelt had been groomed by the powerful NY Jewish political machine to be the Governor of NY and future President of the United States. In 1900, McKinley was forced by Republican partisans of the Jews to appoint “Teddy” Roosevelt as Vice President to get the “Jewish vote.” McKinley’s appointment of Roosevelt soon turned out to be his demise.

ENTER JEW COMMUNIST-ANARCHISTS
EMMA GOLDMAN & LEON CZOLGOSZ
JEWS SWARMED OUT OF POLAND AND RUSSIA beginning in the 1880’s.

ON SEPTEMBER 6 1901, a 28 year old Polish Jew, Leon Czolgosz, walked into the Pan-American Exposition in Buffalo NY where McKinley was speaking and shot McKinley twice in the abdomen at point blank range. McKinley died a week later and “Teddy” Roosevelt was sworn in as President, much to the delight of the NY Jews.

Prior to the assassination, Leon Czolgosz had fallen in with Emma Goldman’s Jewish anarchist crowd at Sach’s Cafe on Suffolk Street, their headquarters in New York City’s Lower East Side. (NYC’s Lower East Side was where Trotsky, owing to Jacob Schiff’s financial support, had recruited many communist Jews to travel with him to Russia to incite the October Revolution of 1917.)

Emma Goldman’s crowd had broken away from main-line socialists who were “under the eye of a paternal government.” Instead, Goldman’s crowd preached that social change could only be achieved through violence and assassinations. They preached that capitalists would never change on their own volition. Thus it was here at Sach’s Cafe that the assassination plot against President McKinley, a “capitalist,” was hatched.

One member of Emma Goldman’s group, the Jew, Julius Edelson, was quoted by the NY police as saying to them:

— “No matter how much Czolgolz has been damned for his good work, we know that he was a great man. He was a true hero.” — See: “Anarchists Attack Police” Here

And not only this, but the Jew, Emma Goldman, is extolled by Jewry as a “heroine” — even though she preached violence to attain her anarchist aims as recorded in The Jewish Women Archives:

— “Emma Goldman refused to condemn Czolgosz and other like-minded individuals who were driven to acts of violence against representatives of the capitalist system. Emma Goldman admired the sensitivity that led Czolgosz to this extreme.” —

Indeed – in Emma Goldman’s autobiography, Living My Life, when describing her arrest after McKinley’s assassination, she wrote, “My sympathies were with Czolgosz.”

See: Emma Goldman’s Use Of Violence-Tragedy At Buffalo, October 6 1901Here. (Click On “Full Image” & Scroll Down)

FOUR DAYS AFTER Czolgosz’ assassination of McKinley, on September 10 1901, Emma Goldman was arrested (but released!) in Chicago under suspicion of corroborating in President McKinley’s assassination. She was arrested many times prior to and after this arrest for “inciting to riot and violence.” Here

EMMA GOLDMAN & HER JEWISH ANARCHIST LOVER
ALEXANDER BERKMAN
GOLDMAN’S LOVER WAS ANOTHER Jewish communist-anarchist by the name of Alexander Berkman. Berkman was imprisoned in 1892 for his attempted assassination of the steel magnate, Henry Clay Frick.

Emma Goldman assisted Berkman in his attempted assassination of Frick by obtaining a pistol for him to use Here (1st paragraph) And: Here. But at the trial Berkman refused to testify against his Jewish-communist lover, Emma Goldman.

Goldman visited Berkman in prison where they talked about their future anarchist plans Here. Both Goldman and Berkman were associated with the “Haymarket Anarchists,” a group led by 8 Jewish communists who threw a bomb into a crowd which killed 7 police officers during their Chicago anarchist rally in 1886 Here.

Emma Goldman and Alexander Berkman, being communists, were most likely funded by the powerful communist-supporter, Jacob Schiff, the renowned Jewish banker of Kuhn Loeb, who funded the burgeoning Bolshevik movement in Russia.

Through Emma Goldman’s association with Schiff, and other powerful Jews, she was *never* charged with her numerous crimes which included her role in the McKinley assassination as well as inciting violence against American police.

Eventually Emma Goldman was finally deported to Russia where she joined the Bolsheviks and later assisted them in inciting the communist rebels against the Christian loyalists in the Spanish Civil War.

 

Do You Remember The Times Jewish Conspirators Assassinated US Presidents And Other World Leaders?

Assassinated US PresidentsDo You Remember The Times Jewish Conspirators Assassinated US Presidents And Other World Leaders?

By Jack Allen

When I started to notice in our current time, that there seems to be one group of people that seems not to have any regard for human life what so ever. I started to have questions. Let us look at Israel for an example and see all the crimes they do. Yes, we can call this a Jewish state and we can see innocent Palestinian children, women and being killed daily and their property being taken away. There is a Genocide going on just like the Ukrainian Holocaust (Holodomor) and the Armenian Holocaust that Jews were behind. We know Stalin and his Bolshevik Jews were the biggest mass murderers in history.

Now let us look at the Jewish Neocons and Zionist Puppet Politicians in the US today, they have a crazy war and death lust. They don’t care if innocent people are killed along with whoever they say is a terrorist around the world. They just create lies and do false flags to manipulate the public to support their Satanic evil.

If you see any politician around the world that is pushing for wars that seem to benefit Israel or the Central Bank scheme you know that politician is a Zionist puppet. So with that said, let us look at some scary history about assassinations and see an interesting common denominator.

Former Jews and Honorable Jews have pointed out this same information throughout the years, so all Jews of course are not responsible for the actions of others in their group. This is just about exposing evil, that if not stopped will destroy the planet.

The Satanic system that these evil people are trying to build through assassinations and usury schemes needs to be exposed.

Things are getting worse not better with these control freaks and nations are being dismantled by forced immigration and multiculturalism . There is an attempt to create a debt slave worldwide population that will be manipulated and controlled every moment of their lives. Maybe this video about the Talmud has the answer.

The Talmud Unmasked~ The Secret Rabbinical Teachings Concerning Non-Jews



Video: Judaism = Zionism = Satanism? Judaism Exposed! Texe Marrs


JEWISH POLITICAL ASSASSINATIONS

The Jewish conspirators have committed several major political assassinations. These assassinations change history and destabilize nations.

* King Louis of France and Marie Antoinette in 1793

JUDEO MASONRY INCITES THE FRENCH REVOLUTION
THE FRENCH REVOLUTION OF 1789 came about under the influence of Judeo Masonry and the subversive society behind it known as the Illuminati. This is now an established fact.

Seeing that the Jews obtained emancipation in France only 2 years after the Revolution and that the new Social Order imposed by the Revolution summed up in the catch-cry “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity,” (an impossible and contradictory ideology), was based upon Jewish Anti-Christian principles unheard of in Christian Europe, it is necessary to see what relationship the wealthy Jews of the time had with regard to the outbreak. Source

Thus the Jewish financiers behind the 1789 French Revolution are as follows:

Chaim Veitel Ephraim (1703-1775): Berlin, Court Jew to Frederick the Great.

Daniel Itzig (1722-1799): Berlin, Court Jew to Frederick William II.

Hertzel Cerfbeer (1730-1793): France, Jewish financier of the French army.

Mayer Amschel Rothshchild (1744-1812): Frankfurt, Jewish Money Lender.

Benjamin Goldsmid (1755-1808): London, William Pitt’s financier.

Abraham Goldsmid(1756-1810): London, Benjamin Goldsmid’s brother.

Moses Mocatta(1768-1857): London, partner of the Goldsmids and uncle of Sir Moses Montefiore.

These Jews & All Of Their Jewish Compatriots Are Guilty Of The Righteous Blood
Of The Holy Monarchs Of France, King Louis XVI & Queen Marie Antoinette!

Source

* American president Abraham Lincoln in 1865

John Wilkes Booth Was Jewish

John Wilkes Booth was a Jew.

Quote

John Wilkes Booth, assassin of Lincoln, was half Jewish.

Booth’s Sister says they are half Jewish

In the book, John Wilkes Booth – A Sister’s Memoir by Asia Booth, it is revealed that John Wilkes Booth’s father, Junius Brutus Booth, was Jewish.
The passage reads: “Born in 1796 to a highly educated clan of Jewish lawyers and silversmiths on his father’s side”

 

The Lone Assassin Myth is Born Modern researchers have uncovered evidence of a massive conspiracy that links the following parties to the Bank of Rothschild: Lincoln’s Secretary of War Edwin Stanton, John Wilkes Booth, his eight co-conspirators, and over seventy government officials and businessmen involved in the conspiracy. When Booth’s diary was recovered by Stanton’s troops, it was delivered to Stanton. When it was later produced during the investigation, eighteen pages had been ripped out. These pages, containing the aforementioned names,were later found in the attic of one of Stanton’s descendants.From Booth’s trunk, a coded message was found that linked him directly to Judah P. Benjamin, the Civil War campaign manager in the South for the House of Rothschild.

When the war ended, the key to the code was found in Benjamin’s possession.Theassassin, portrayed as a crazed lone gunman with a few radical friends, escaped by way of the only bridge in Washington not guarded by Stanton’s troops.”Booth” was located hiding in a barn near Port Royal, Virginia, three days after escaping from Washington. He was shot by a soldier named Boston Corbett, who fired without orders. Whether or not the man killed was Booth is still a matter of contention, but the fact remains that whoever it was, he had no chance to identify himself. It was Secretary of War Edwin Stanton who made the final identification. Some now believe that a dupe was used and that the real John Wilkes Booth escaped with Stanton’s assistance.

Mary Todd Lincoln, upon hearing of her husband’s death, began screaming, “Oh, that dreadful house!” Earlier historians felt that this spontaneous utterance referred to the White House. Some now believe it may have been directed to Thomas W. House, a gun runner, financier, and agent of the Rothschild’s during the Civil War, who was linked to the anti-Lincoln, pro-banker interests.

* People’s Will group, killed Russian Czar Alexander in 1881.

Alexander II, Russian Tsar, Murdered by Jewish Terrorists

Source

The Jews had been running commercial life in Poland. Since 1792, Poland had been governed by Russia. The Russian governors had occasionally taken action against their crimes. This aroused considerable resentment. How about a little revolt?The tsar, Nicholas I, put down one of many Jewish rebellions in 1831.
(Henri Troyat, Zar Alexander II., Societaets-Verlag, 1990, p.31) The Jews didn’t let a little military defeat discourage them, so they had another go at Nicholas I. He became ill in 1855. Word was that the Jews had poisoned him. And so he died. (id., pp. 33-34)He was succeeded by his silly son, who became known as Tsar Alexander II. A war had been raging in the Crimea. Alexander II ended the war with a peace deal. Russia didn’t have to do much. They just had give up their role as the protector of Christians in the Ottoman empire. (id., p. 46) Up to that time, the Ottoman empire was forced to treat Christians with some respect. Now all that would change as the Jewish donmah from Saloniki would proceed to kill millions of Christians ending with the slaughter of 1915.

In 1861, the Jews started another revolution in Poland. (id., p. 80) A Jew, Jaroschinski, who was a tailor, tried to shoot the Russian governor in Poland, Grand Prince Konstantin. Another Jew put a bullet through the jaw of the tsar’s representative Lueders. (id., p. 84) (pic: Wikipedia)

The Jew Jaroschinski and several other terrorists were executed. (id., p. 85) The Jews in general were irritated by these developments. So they launched a general uprising in January 1863. (id., p. 85) Needless to say, the Jewish press in France took the part of the rebels. They called the Russians bloodthirsty barbarians. (id., p. 88)

And how did Tsar Alexander II react? He weakened the aristocracy, and thought to give more democracy “for the people”. (id., p. 107) But what really sealed his fate was the abolition of the tax farming system on liquors. This was a Jewish business. When the tax farming operations were phased out in favor of an excise tax in 1863 (Ben Eklof, John Bushnell, Larisa Georgievna Zakharova, Russia’s Great Reforms, 1855-1881, Indiana University Press, 1994, p. 110), the Jews knew that this tsar had to go.

The Jews were just campaigning for “democracy”, right? And they quite their agitation? Not at all. As we learned here, Jews regard any compromise as weakness. The Jew Pissarew was working as a literary critic at the Russkoje Slowo. He advocated revolutionary action. (Troyat, p. 110)

It must be noted here that the Russian peasants did not support revolutionary efforts. They demonstrated a solid faith in the Tsar. (Peter Waldron, The End of Imperial Russia, 1855 – 1917, MacMillian Press, 1997, p. 22) Unfortunately, this faith was not merited. Even though Alexander II was a weak man who made stupid decisions, he still had some intelligent advisers. Like Prince Basil Dolgorukow. In 1862, Prince Dolgorukow advised the tsar that his weakness and concessions to the Jews would end in his demise. The prince recommended arresting 50 of the worst Jews.

The tsar didn’t want to follow this wise advice. (Troyat, p. 112)

So how can we tell if the prince was right or not?

Well, just look at what happens next: In 1866, a Jew tried to shoot the tsar while he was out walking. The Jew claimed that the tsar hadn’t given the people enough land. (id., pp. 114 – 115)

Prince Dolgorukow had been right all along.

So the tsar took the wise advice now?

No, he just showed how foolish he was. The tsar’s response to the attempted killing was to dismiss Prince Dolgorukow. (id., p. 117) The prince had to go, but the tsar retained a number of Jews (most baptized) on his staff (id., p. 122)

The prince had told the tsar what the problem was, but Tsar Alexander didn’t want to hear the truth. Instead, he pretended that he was puzzled, and wanted to know what the cause was. (id., p. 118)

The shooting was a wake-up call, but the tsar just ignored it. How much longer before Prince Dolgorukow’s prophecy came into fulfillment?

On June 6, 1867, the tsar was visiting in Paris. The Jew Beresowskij squeezed off two shots, but both missed the mark. (id., p. 144) In 1879, an explosion hit the tsar’s baggage train. (id., picture 20) The Jews on his staff had apparently tipped the Jewish bombers, but a last-minute change in schedule was apparently not passed on. In April 1879, the Jew Solowjew tried to shoot him. (id., picture 21)

Alexander II, Russian Tsar

* Charles Guiteau, killed American President James Garfield in 1881.

After the Civil War, all money in the United States was created by bankers buying U.S. government bonds in exchange for bank notes.

 

Screen Shot 2016-05-28 at 10.46.32 AMJames A. Garfield became president in 1881, and he was a staunch opponent of the banking powers. In 1881 he said the following:
“Whoever controls the volume of money in our country is absolute master of all industry and commerce…and when you realize that the entire system is very easily controlled, one way or another, by a few powerful men at the top, you will not have to be told how periods of inflation and depression originate.”

He who controls the money supply of a nation controls the nation.
President James A. Garfield

 

President Garfield was shot about two weeks later by Charles J. Guiteau on July 2nd, 1881.

Screen Shot 2016-05-28 at 10.50.42 AM

He died from medical complications on September 19th, 1881.

Screen Shot 2016-05-28 at 10.50.56 AM

 

* Leon Czolgocz, killed American president William McKinley in New York state in 1901.

Do You Remember When President McKinley Was Assassinated By Jews To Usher In Federal Reserve Act of 1913?

In 1906, the U.S. stock market was setting all kinds of records. However, in March 1907 the U.S. stock market absolutely crashed. It is alleged that elite New York bankers were responsible.

In addition, in 1907 J.P. Morgan circulated rumors that a major New York bank had gone bankrupt. This caused a massive run on the banks. In turn, the banks started recalling all of their loans. The panic of 1907 resulted in a congressional investigation that ended up concluding that a central bank was “necessary” so that these kinds of panics would never happen again.

It took a few years, but the international bankers finally got their central bank in 1913.

Congress voted on the Rothschild’s Federal Reserve Act on December 22nd, 1913 between the hours of 1:30 AM and 4:30 AM.

A significant portion of Congress was either sleeping at the time or was already at home with their families celebrating the holidays.

The president that signed the law that created the Federal Reserve, Woodrow Wilson, later sounded like he very much regretted the decision when he wrote the following:
“A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is privately concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men … [W]e have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world–no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and the duress of small groups of dominant men.”

* Gavril Princip, killed Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife in 1914.

World War I begins when Austria-Hungarian Archduke Franz Ferdinand is assassinated by Jewish student Gavrilo Princip and a group of co-conspirators. William Pelley claims that the assassins were financed by Jewish businessman Herbert Samuel of Britain, owner of Shell Oil. Over 10 million Europeans are killed in this war. World War I is a disasterous war and it starts the decline of the European people. World War I is supported by Jews such as Nathan Rothschild, Jacob Schiff, Paul Warburg, Bernard Baruch, Ernest Cassel, Louis Brandeis, Chaim Weizmann, Theodore Bethmann, Winston Churchill, Theodore Roosevelt, and Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

* Sverdlov, killed Russian Czar Nicholas II and his family in 1918.

* Carl Weiss, killed US senator Huey Long in 1935.

* US Government, killed president Anastasio Somoza of Nicaragua in 1956.
* US Government, killed president Patrice Lumumba of the Congo in 1961.

* US Government, killed president Ngo Diem of Vietnam in 1963.

* American president John F. Kennedy in 1963

THE ISRAELI CONNECTION

Why would Israel have an interest in participating in the JFK assassination conspiracy? That was the burning question.

It was just about the time that I had begun to take a second look at the Lansky connection to the Kennedy assassination that several new works about the covert relationship between the United States and Israel were released providing never-before revealed information.

These books, cited extensively in Final Judgment, made it all too clear that John F. Kennedy-before his death-was in a pitched battle with Israel. In fact, Kennedy was at war.

This was something that long-time JFK assassination researchers had no reason to know about. Much of the material had long been classified. It was a secret-a deep, dark secret.

Some of JFK’s communications with then-Israeli Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion are still classified. Not even top-level intelligence officials with special security clearance have been allowed access to these potentially explosive documents.

This discovery made me realize that there was a lot more to the Kennedy relationship with Israel and a lot more about the JFK assassination than we had ever been told.

* American senator Robert Kennedy in 1968
Shocking Info in this book!

Screen Shot 2016-05-28 at 11.48.33 AM
* US Government, killed Salvador Allende of Chile in 1973.
Shocking Info in this book!

Zionist Henry Kissinger pressed Nixon to overthrow the democratically elected Allende government because his “‘model’ effect can be insidious,” documents show

On 40th anniversary of coup, Archive posts top ten documents on Kissinger’s role in undermining democracy, supporting military dictatorship in Chile

Kissinger overruled aides on military regime’s human rights atrocities; told Pinochet in 1976: “We want to help, not undermine you. You did a great service to the West in overthrowing Allende.”

Revelations:

  • On September 12, eight days after Allende’s election, Kissinger initiated discussion on the telephone with CIA director Richard Helm’s about a preemptive coup in Chile. “We will not let Chile go down the drain,” Kissinger declared. “I am with you,” Helms responded. Their conversation took place three days before President Nixon, in a 15-minute meeting that included Kissinger, ordered the CIA to “make the economy scream,” and named Kissinger as the supervisor of the covert efforts to keep Allende from being inaugurated. Since the Kissinger/Helms “telcon” was not known to the Church Committee, the Senate report on U.S. intervention in Chile and subsequent histories date the initiation of U.S. efforts to sponsor regime change in Chile to the September 15 meeting.
  • Kissinger ignored a recommendation from his top deputy on the NSC, Viron Vaky, who strongly advised against covert action to undermine Allende. On September 14, Vaky wrote a memo to Kissinger arguing that coup plotting would lead to “widespread violence and even insurrection.” He also argued that such a policy was immoral: “What we propose is patently a violation of our own principles and policy tenets .… If these principles have any meaning, we normally depart from them only to meet the gravest threat to us, e.g. to our survival. Is Allende a mortal threat to the U.S.? It is hard to argue this.”
  • After U.S. covert operations, which led to the assassination of Chilean Commander in Chief of the Armed forces General Rene Schneider, failed to stop Allende’s inauguration on November 4, 1970, Kissinger lobbied President Nixon to reject the State Department’s recommendation that the U.S. seek a modus vivendi with Allende. In an eight-page secret briefing paper that provided Kissinger’s clearest rationale for regime change in Chile, he emphasized to Nixon that “the election of Allende as president of Chile poses for us one of the most serious challenges ever faced in this hemisphere” and “your decision as to what to do about it may be the most historic and difficult foreign affairs decision you will make this year.” Not only were a billion dollars of U.S. investments at stake, Kissinger reported, but what he called “the insidious model effect” of his democratic election. There was no way for the U.S. to deny Allende’s legitimacy, Kissinger noted, and if he succeeded in peacefully reallocating resources in Chile in a socialist direction, other countries might follow suit. “The example of a successful elected Marxist government in Chile would surely have an impact on — and even precedent value for — other parts of the world, especially in Italy; the imitative spread of similar phenomena elsewhere would in turn significantly affect the world balance and our own position in it.”The next day Nixon made it clear to the entire National Security Council that the policy would be to bring Allende down. “Our main concern,” he stated, “is the prospect that he can consolidate himself and the picture projected to the world will be his success.”
  • In the days following the coup, Kissinger ignored the concerns of his top State Department aides about the massive repression by the new military regime. He sent secret instructions to his ambassador to convey to Pinochet “our strongest desires to cooperate closely and establish firm basis for cordial and most constructive relationship.” When his assistant secretary of state for inter-American affairs asked him what to tell Congress about the reports of hundreds of people being killed in the days following the coup, he issued these instructions: “I think we should understand our policy-that however unpleasant they act, this government is better for us than Allende was.” The United States assisted the Pinochet regime in consolidating, through economic and military aide, diplomatic support and CIA assistance in creating Chile’s infamous secret police agency, DINA.
  • At the height of Pinochet’s repression in 1975, Secretary Kissinger met with the Chilean foreign minister, Admiral Patricio Carvajal. Instead of taking the opportunity to press the military regime to improve its human rights record, Kissinger opened the meeting by disparaging his own staff for putting the issue of human rights on the agenda. “I read the briefing paper for this meeting and it was nothing but Human Rights,” he told Carvajal. “The State Department is made up of people who have a vocation for the ministry. Because there are not enough churches for them, they went into the Department of State.”
  • As Secretary Kissinger prepared to meet General Augusto Pinochet in Santiago in June 1976, his top deputy for Latin America, William D. Rogers, advised him make human rights central to U.S.-Chilean relations and to press the dictator to “improve human rights practices.” Instead, a declassified transcript of their conversation reveals, Kissinger told Pinochet that his regime was a victim of leftist propaganda on human rights. “In the United States, as you know, we are sympathetic with what you are trying to do here,” Kissinger told Pinochet. “We want to help, not undermine you. You did a great service to the West in overthrowing Allende.”

* Yigal Amir, killed Yitzhak Rabin in 1995.

Zionist Israeli killed own prime minister

 

JFK Assassination Researcher Discusses Secret Societies, UFOs and Aliens

UFOs and Aliens Facts with Jim Marrs
UFOs and Aliens Facts with Jim Marrs

In this video Luke Rudkowski interviews author and researcher Jim Marrs on the very controversial topic of UFOs and Aliens. The two discuss the taboo of covering the topic and some of the most important information relating to the subject. Jim Marrs is an American former newspaper journalist and New York Times bestselling author of books and articles on a wide range of alleged cover ups and conspiracies. Marrs is a prominent figure in the JFK conspiracy press and his book Crossfire was a source for Oliver Stone’s film JFK. He has written books asserting the existence of government conspiracies regarding aliens, 9/11, telepathy, and secret societies. He was once a news reporter in the Dallas–Fort Worth Metroplex and has taught a class on the assassination of John F. Kennedy at University of Texas at Arlington for 30 years.


Video Below: UFO Sightings CIA Covers Up UFOs And The Alien Agenda? Jim Marrs Explains Exclusive 2013

Tags: UFOs, Aliens, Jim Marrs, JFK, cover up, conspiracies

Long Hidden Footage Of The JFK Assassination Reports To Show A 2nd Shooter Hiding In The Bushes

Long-Hidden Video Reports To Show A Second Shooter Of John F. Kennedy

Screen Shot 2013-11-25 at 8.58.34 PM

November 25, 2013

Source: Daily Mail

A Texas real-estate developer is in possession of footage of John F. Kennedy’s motorcade from that fateful day in Dallas that he believes supports the theory that Lee Harvey Oswald did not act alone.

Whether or not the footage is genuine isn’t yet known, but if it is, it would represent a dramatic development in a story 50 years in the making.

Following the 50th anniversary of the death of JFK, Stephen Bowen, who is also a principal in small film production company, decided the time was right to sell the footage, which reportedly depicts a second shooter, to the highest bidder.

According to The Wrap, Bowen acquired the film from a Houston television news producer, who had held onto it secretly for more than 40 years.

While no one has yet viewed the footage, it’s said to show a second shooter hiding in the bushes along the route the presidential motorcade took on 22 November, 1963.

‘You can see a guy in the bushes with a gun,’ the source told The Wrap.

It also reportedly contains lost and damaged frames from the famous footage made by Abraham Zapruder and sold to Time in 1963.

Video: JFK Assassination Dealey Plaza Acoustic Evidence 2nd shooter

The 50th anniversary of John F Kennedy’s death has reignited the debate about the assassination, with many speculating recently that Lee Harvey Oswald did not act alone, including Oswald’s wife Marina Oswald, and John F Kennedy’s nephew, Robert F Kennedy Jr.

Read More…

    • More On The JFK Assassination Below

Tags: JFK Assassination, Dealey Plaza, Dallas, tourists, conspiracy theorist, murder, LBJ, JFK, John F Kennedy,  John F. Kennedy, JFK Assassination, Conspiracy, Abraham Zapruder, Lee Harvey Oswald

Dallas, Tx Sheriff’s Deputies Under DHS Rear Their Ugly Head at JFK 50th Anniversary


Dallas Co., Texas sheriff’s deputies, under federal control during special events, violently charged a peaceful crowd who were waiting to be let into the Dealey Plaza when it was promised to be open to the public at 2:30pm on Nov. 22, the 50th anniversary of the JFK assassination.

When the attack began, the official ceremony was already over and Dealey Plaza was practically empty.

One deputy at the scene admitted he was “just following orders from the sheriff’s department.”

The sheriff’s department, on the other hand, was following orders from the Department of Homeland Security, who controlled the entire event.

——–

Infowars is seeking additional footage of the attack. If you recorded video while on the scene at the time, please upload it to YouTube or another video upload site and send us the link to the uploaded film to showtips@infowars.com
http://www.infowars.com/violent-suppr…

Tags: police, Police State, Big Brother, JFK Protesters, JFK Assassination, JFK, Dallas

Cover-up: Are People Buying The Government Fairy Tale Of The JFK Assassination?

Very Graphic Detailed Film Of The JFK Assassination As It Happened
Very Graphic Detailed Film Of The JFK Assassination As It Happened

Tags: JFK Assassination, Dealey Plaza, Dallas, tourists, conspiracy theorist, murder, LBJ, JFK, John F Kennedy, 1st Amendment, Alex Jones

The Man Who Released The Zapruder Film Of The JFK Assassination Talks About The Cover-up

The Man Who Released The JFK Assassination – Zapruder Film Speaks Out About The Gov Cover-up

Tags: JFK Assassination, Dealey Plaza, Dallas, tourists, conspiracy theorist, murder, LBJ, JFK, John F Kennedy

1963 Eyewitness Of JFK Assassination Says No Way On The Magic Bullet Theory, Say LBJ Guilty

Alex Jones welcomes James Tague, a famous witness who was also shot in Dallas, Texas on the morning of November 22, 1963 during the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.

Tags: JFK Assassination, Dealey Plaza, Dallas, tourists, conspiracy theorist, murder, LBJ, JFK, John F Kennedy