Tag Archives: Germany

Forced Multiculturalism At Work? Caught On Video – Woman Kicked Down Stairs By Thug In Berlin, Germany

Forced Multiculturalism At Work? Caught On Video – Woman Kicked Down Stairs By Thug In Berlin, Germany

Opinion By Jack Allen

A woman was kicked down a flight of stairs by a thug in Berlin, Germany. The 26-year-old woman was hospitalized and is now helping police with their inquiries. German police only released the footage this week.

Are these thugs Mossad agents playing Muslims? We should always remember Mossad, Israel and Satanic Zionists did 9/11. This is what these evil freaks do to cause division and get people to fight and die for their Satanic Agenda.

The controlled Zionist media teaches you who you should hate for the Zionist agenda as well.

If these criminal thugs were Muslims or migrants that should also be blamed on Satanic Zionists and their pushing of open borders for all white Christian nations. Satanic Zionists have a war on white Christians.

The crime is still under investigation. Let’s hope and pray that these evil spineless thugs go away for a very long time.

Shock Related Video: History of Multiculturalism


Related Playlist

Caught, The Mass Murdering Bolshevik Jews That Occupied The Soviet Union Forged German War Crimes

Caught, The Mass Murdering Bolshevik Jews That Occupied The Soviet Union Forged German War Crimes
jewslieaboutww2


World War II justified by former German soldiers


World War 2: Fake Pictures Of German Brutality


Look around you, who really won WW2. We have been lied to and Satanic Zionist evil runs the planet.


World Defeated The Wrong Enemy


Holocaust Hoax Exposed!

What Happened at Babi Yar? Fact vs. Myth

Babi Yar today with stone memorial in the form of a Menorah.
Babi Yar today with stone memorial in the form of a Menorah.

Babi Yar today with stone memorial in the form of a Menorah.

[Editor’s note: It is 75 years since the alleged massacre of Kievan Jews at the ravine of Babi Yar. Ukrainian President Poroshenko has made impassioned speeches and mentioned 100,000 victims. Other estimates of the death toll range from 30,000 upto an incredible 300,000.

This narrative is the climax of the Einsatzgruppen allegations, but, like the Holocaust narrative as a whole, is largely the work of Stalin’s arch black propagandists Wassily Grossman and Ilya Ehrenburg. There is no solid evidence that the killings ever took place, just a handful of contradictory ‘eyewitness’ statements. However, we do have a number of pieces of solid evidence that the killings never took place, not least aerial reconnaissance photos of the site, held in the US National Archives and showing not one sign of any activity at the ravine.

There were killings and burials at Babi Yar in the 1920s and 1930s, the work of the murderous NKVD, just one of countless mass murders they carried out on Stalin’s orders. The Khatyn Forest mass killing of Polish officers being perhaps the most well known.

The following article by a Ukrainian author gives a good overview of the case, but there are many more fine works on the subject to be found online, all of them concluding that there is no substance to the story of an Einsatzgruppen mass killing. Ian]

Alleged photograph of an Einsatzgruppen at work. However, this is almost certainly a Soviet forgery, a recreation for the cameras. The ‘executioner’ is holding a Soviet Tokarev pistol and the uniforms worn are a bizarre mixture – are we to believe that the Einstazgruppen killings were spectated by such a motley collection of soldiery from all kinds of units? Included are a man wearing the tunic of a regimental bandsman with large shoulder pieces and panzer crewmen in their black uniforms.
Alleged photograph of an Einsatzgruppen at work. However, this is almost certainly a Soviet forgery, a recreation for the cameras. The ‘executioner’ is holding a Soviet Tokarev pistol and the uniforms worn are a bizarre mixture – are we to believe that the Einstazgruppen killings were spectated by such a motley collection of soldiery from all kinds of units? Included are a man wearing the tunic of a regimental bandsman with large shoulder pieces and panzer crewmen in their black uniforms.

23809Luftwaffe aerial photograph of Sept. 26th, 1943. It shows no activity at Babi Yar and no signs of there having been any activity at all.


What Happened at Babi Yar? Fact vs. Myth

by Michael Nikiforuk

THE MEMORY of the “massacre” of Jews at Babi Yar is painful to all politicians. But evidence shows it never happened. Aerial reconnaissance photos taken before and during World War II show mass graves of victims of the Soviet Cheka/NKVD, but an absence of Jewish mass burials.

What if anything, happened at a place called Babi Yar (Old Woman’s Ravine) near Kiev, Ukraine – September 29, 1941? According to official histories and inscriptions on monuments, 250,000 people, mostly Jews, were killed by the Nazis there. But if thousands of Kievan Jews (those not evacuated by the Soviets) were killed in September of 1941 by the Germans, they were not murdered or buried at Babi Yar. This fact was revealed in aerial reconnaissance photos discovered in the U.S. National Archives in Washington, DC.

In February 1997 a Ukrainian court threw out a case brought by Ukrainian Jews against V. Kretytnychy of the St. Andrew Society and E. Musiyenko, editor of the Kiev Evening News (Vechirnyi Kyiv), who challenged the official Babi Yar story. Encouraged by the court decision, on March 19, 1997 the Kiev Evening News published a four-page story setting the record straight for the first time since the Allies condemned the phony “atrocity” during World War II.

What is now coming to the fore is incontrovertible proof that no massacre took place at Babi Yar during the German occupation of Kiev; that the ravine was not used as a mass grave for Jews killed by the Germans. But it was a burial field between 1922-1935 for the victims of the Cheka/NKVD.
For decades, aerial photography has been recognized as an indispensable archaeological tool. With sophisticated equipment, ruins of ancient cities and cemeteries that lie under cultivated fields, forgotten for decades or centuries, have been discovered. Even submerged Hellenic ports have been discovered by aerial photography.

In 1991, wartime aerial photographs from the National Archives in Washington, DC were used as the ultimate guidance in exhumations of hundreds of Polish officers and intellectuals massacred in 1939-40 by the Soviet NKVD in the vicinity of Kharkiv. Aerial photos of Kiev’s distant suburbs, including Bykivnia, Bilhorodka and Darnista, revealed mass graves of victims of the 1930’s Stalinist terror-famine. It is therefore logical to assume that aerial photos of a ravine would reveal evidence of recent mass graves or of a major topographic disturbance.

The US National Archives in Washington contain about 1,100,000 wartime aerial photos, among them some 600 of Kiev, including Babi Yar. They were taken during 20 or more flights over the area. The first photos, taken at 12:23 pm on May 17, 1939, reveal such details as cars and even the shadows of the lamp posts on the streets of Kiev. Every large bush and small tree is visible on the slopes and at the bottom of the Babi Yar ravine. The last aerial photo coverage of Kiev (and Babi Yar) took place on June 18, 1944, about nine months after the city’s “liberation” by the Red Army.

This series of reconnaissance photos demonstrates that the flora and the ground cover of the ravine remained undisturbed throughout the two years of German occupation. When the early and late photos are compared, it is obvious that the scattered trees grew and became slightly larger. No evidence of human or large animal activity in the ravine can be discerned on the many aerial photos of Babi Yar taken repeatedly in different seasons of the years 1939-1944.

In November of 1943, a group of Western journalists, including New York Times correspondent William “Bill” Lawrence, himself Jewish, were invited to Kiev by the Soviets. This occurred two weeks after the city’s fall to the Red Army. The reporters were told that this was only six weeks after the Germans had completed the dynamiting, disinterment and open-air cremation of 70,000 corpses, followed by the crushing and bulldozing of the unburned bones into the soil of the ravine.

But the Western journalists were hard pressed to find any convincing physical evidence at the site of the alleged massacre.

The lack of reliable physical evidence of this “greatest massacre of World War II” – and the inability to find a single inhabitant of Kiev willing to corroborate the story – impelled the NKVD to provide the Westerners with three “eyewitnesses.” Even though a Times editor censored out the most egregious exaggerations (about Soviet partisans and German “gassing vans”), the disjointed story by these three liberated Soviet POW’s became the template for imitation for all subsequent Babi Yar testimonies.

When one realizes that all liberated Soviet POW’s were facing either a firing squad or a short-lived future in the Gulags (it was a capital crime in the USSR for a soldier to be captured alive by the enemy), one realizes why it was easy for the NKVD to coerce any expedient statement from them.

Two weeks later, Soviet authorities were able to orchestrate massive “grass roots” support for their three Babi Yar witnesses. According to the “front pages of Moscow newspapers,” (as reported in the United States), “40,000 Kiev residents [sent a letter] to Premier Josef Stalin, raising the estimate of the number killed and burned in the [Babi Yar] ravine to more than 10,000 (New York Times, Dec. 4, 1943).

Since – in later years – only 11 of these supposedly well-informed citizens offered any testimony, the wartime statistical reports in the NYT regarding Babi Yar (as well as the subsequent testimonies of belated witnesses) may be considered baseless. By 1943, the NKVD had a well-earned reputation for its ability to obtain any testimony from almost any witness.

For instance, in August of 1941, the Soviet press agency TASS and the Associated Press reported as fact the testimonies of NKVD-provided witnesses to the effect that the massacre of about 4,000 Ukrainians in NKVD prisons in the city of Lviv in late June of that year “was committed by the Nazi Storm troopers.” This in spite of the fact that Lviv had not been taken by the Germans until July 1, 1941. Long famous testimony extorted by the NKVD from a large number of witnesses told of the mass murder of 4,500 Polish military officers and intellectuals by the Nazis in the Katyn Forest. These fraudulent testimonies, taken under oath in the fall of 1943, were finally refuted by the Russians in the spring of 1990.

However, this admission was not forthcoming until the German pre-invasion aerial reconnaissance photo of Katyn (showing the mass graves of the Polish officers, teachers, etc.) had been transmitted in the fall of 1989 to the Soviet authorities.

Chronology suggests that the NKVD provided Western correspondents with three Soviet ex-POW, as witnesses of the Babi Yar massacre to test their credibility under scrutiny of non-Soviets. In 1943, the Babi Yar massacre, being almost unknown in the West and thus unimportant, was apparently selected by the NKVD for such a “dress rehearsal” prior to the contemplated exposure to Western journalists of fraudulent Katyn massacre witnesses in this far more publicized and more politically important affair.

As a result of the failed Babi Yar credibility test for their ex-POWs, the Soviets for 25 years did not provide access to live “eyewitnesses” of massacres to Western correspondents in Katyn or elsewhere.

Furthermore, the Soviets postponed the inspection of Katyn by Westerners for four months, from Sept. 29, 1943 to January 24, 1944, until the site and the physical evidence were covered by snow and literally frozen, as was the reporters’ investigative zeal in the unheated tents provided them.

Among the observers of the work of the Soviet investigative commission was 25-year-old Kathleen Harriman (daughter of then-US Ambassador to Moscow W. Averell Harriman) who, in her naivete’, later became (along with her father) a champion of Soviet credibility. On the other hand, the more experienced Lawrence from the NYT, who was also present, was even more skeptical in his Katyn report about presented evidence than in his earlier Babi Yar story. As a result, his Katyn report was spiked and never published.

Thus, the false testimony of the NKVD-provided eyewitnesses of the alleged Babi Yar massacre became the cornerstone of a decades-long Soviet judicial policy of not allowing their fraudulent atrocity witnesses to testify independently; that is, beyond the reach of the supervising Soviet prosecutor, or outside the borders of the USSR.

Soviet archival records reveal that the atrocity propaganda about Katyn and Babi Yar was fabricated by Ilya Ehrenburg and Vasily Grossman, who also invented and reported the now discredited victim counts of Nazi concentration camps: 4 million at Auschwitz; 1.5 million at Majdanek and 3.5 million at Treblinka.

Even at the Nuremberg Trials, the Soviets did not provide to Western authorities or correspondents live eyewitnesses to any German massacres, including Babi Yar and Katyn. Instead, Soviet Prosecutor Col. Smirnoff peddled–but without much success–fabrications in the form of affidavits about the two alleged German massacres. Also Ilya Ehrenburg, in his 1947 novel, The Storm, tried unsuccessfully to revitalize the Babi Yar story.

The Old Woman’s Ravine story did not gain “credibility” until 12 years later. Then, a visiting Jewish-Ukrainian-American journalist, Joseph Schechtman, persuaded young Soviet dissident Evgeny Yevtushenko to write an emotional and widely read poem “Babi Yar”.

But poetic fancy cannot stand against physical evidence. Indeed, the aerial photos of the Ahovtnevyi borough of Kiev and the general area of Babi Yar reveal the presence of a row of about 10 mass graves, some 165 yards behind the western fence of Kiev’s labor camp, Syretz. These could contain up to 1,000 victims of the camp buried over the two years of the German occupation of Kiev. Furthermore, at the nearby small Orthodox Lukianivsky cemetery, another, larger mass grave can be seen. This could contain up to 2,000 bodies of the frequent public or surreptitious German executions of resistance fighters of Kiev.

On this subject, according to the Hague Convention (1905) and the Geneva Convention (1920) on the conduct of civilians during wartime, taking part in hostilities without easily visible, external symbols of belonging to the military units is subject to immediate execution.

A number of additional, overlooked historical facts undermine the credibility of the standard tale propagated about Babi Yar today.

For one thing, the Babi Yar massacre was not mentioned in the Ukrainian Resistance press, although the killing of its members by the Germans in Kiev is described.
Secondly, the occurrence of the Babi Yar massacre is excluded, until the late 1970s, from the writings of Ukrainian emigres (former wartime inhabitants of Kiev) as well as from Ukrainian encyclopedias; some published by Western universities.
Thirdly, and perhaps most importantly, for decades the Babi Yar massacre did not catch the literary attention of Kiev’s Jewish population.
The expatriates of about 440 Jewish communities of the USSR were able to produce commemorative books (Yizkerbikhers) about their districts, cities, towns and even villages. But not until 1981 was the first scarce, commemorative book published in a small edition about the Ukrainian capital, Kiev; in Israel in Hebrew. An expanded Yiddish version came out again in a limited edition in the US in 1983. If the massacre at Babyn Yar were true, how could 150,000 surviving, educated Kievan Jews have been so tardy in recording the destruction of their kinsmen?

On the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the alleged “Babi Yar massacre,” the world’s media were replete with reports of the exact number (33,771) of Jews machine-gunned there. They variously reported its timing as taking 48, 36 or 24 hours. However, they rarely mentioned that the suspiciously exact number of victims were derived from captured German documents (so-called “Einsatzgruppen Reports”) and were completely silent about the fact that these purported “exact” reports failed to indicate Babi Yar as the site of the massacre.

The media also failed to mention that almost every major historian, including “Holocaust expert” Prof. Raul Hilberg, considers the atrocities mentioned in these reports as exaggerated.

The wartime aerial photos of Kiev provide incontrovertible proof that the so-called historic documentation of the Babi Yar massacre represents fabricated wartime propaganda and post-war martyr mythology. Perhaps the Nazis had, as promised, deported the missing Kievans away from Kiev. If so, their remains and burial sites should be sought elsewhere.
On the other hand, what may have happened in Kiev can be glimpsed from the dispatch of the United States 12th Army Headquarters in Europe, published in (among others) the May 1, 1945 issue of the New York Herald Tribune. It mentions that a captured German doctor, Gustav Schuebbe, who “confessed” to directing an annihilation institute, where “110,000 Were Murdered by Nazi Physicians in Kiev.” In addition, Schuebbe “admitted he had [himself] murdered about 21,000 persons” with injections, thus apparently outdoing Dr. Mengele, the infamous Auschwitz physician.

So, far, no one in the former USSR, or from Jewish organizations, has attempted to pinpoint the location of the “German Annihilation Institute” (where the remaining “Jews and Gypsies” of Kiev were killed, according to the May 1, 1945 issue of the NYHT). Had such a place existed, it would seem that the site of the “Annihilation Institute” would be the proper Kiev location for the commemorative menorah, erected in 1991 following a visit by then-US President George Bush.

Not until 1966 were Ukrainians implicated in the alleged Babi Yar massacre of Jews. The only witness was an alleged Babi Yar survivor, a Kiev Puppet Theater actress named Dina Pronicheva. The testimony of this Jewish witness is nullified by the absence of any photographic trace of massacre or mass burial. Furthermore, no witness has ever implied the complicity of Ukrainians in acts perpetrated at the never-located German Annihilation Institute of Kiev.

Following the Soviet Union’s demise, the leaders of the then-newly-proclaimed independent Ukraine – instant converts from communism – were fast to jump on the Babi Yar bandwagon.

One of them, Ukraine’s Ambassador to the United Nations, Genadi Udovenko, went so far as to state (Washington Times, Sept. 5, 1991) that “in the first week of the horrible Babi Yar massacre, 50,000 Jews, mostly children, had been slaughtered.”

During the summer of 1941, the Soviets had been able to evacuate about 150,000 Jews from Kiev, while the Germans were advancing through Western Ukraine. Therefore, the Ukrainian Ambassador’s statement was preposterous and inadvertently defamatory.

It suggested that Jewish parents, who had been safely evacuated from Kiev, had abandoned their children.

Perhaps Ukraine’s current leaders might better serve their people, as well as their post-Communist consciences, by exhibiting tangible contrition relative to Communism’s early 1930’s famine-slaughter of unquestionably immense proportions.

The Genocide Of White Christians In Germany Continues, Planned By Pure Evil In The Late 1800s

There’s an explanation for both the migrant invasion and now attacking even the idea of all-white German families.

Jews admit to destroying white race.

threat-of-the-right2-640x480

Parenting Magazine Warns ‘Blond, Cheerful’ Families Dangerous, Likely Right Wing

By Marcus Cicero

This rarely happens, but after reading this piece, I honestly feel sick to my stomach in addition to shaking rage.

Apparently German language publications, which we don’t always notice here in the Anglosphere, have now begun to openly denounce the very concept of all-White families as some sort of danger to the Multicultural-Marxist State, going so far as to claim that proper diverse parents should always be on the lookout for “blond and cheerful families” due to their propensity for right-wing politics and sense of racial identity.

And this filth is actually contained inside a magazine appealing to current and prospective mothers and fathers (mostly mothers), with the ramifications of such an idea likely to include a higher degree of future race-mixing, Feminist abuse of little White children, and a further dearth of human babies in a nation with one of the lowest birth rates in the entire world.

From Breitbart London:

Parenting magazine Baby & Family has told readers to beware of families who are “inconspicuous” and “cheerful”, as these warning signs indicate they are right wing and thus “dangerous”.

Depicted with illustrations featuring solely blonde women and children, the report says ordinary parents must take action against right-wing families and make clear that their ideology has no place in the world.

Asserting that the term “right wing” “stirs up anxiety” and brings to mind “burning refugee homes”, skinheads, and the National Socialist Underground (NSU) group who carried out a string of violent attacks on foreign people, Baby & Family notes that people “rarely connect it with women, family and children”.

This, the high-circulation German magazine declares, “is precisely the great risk” as such people are just as dangerous if not more so as gangs of Nazi skinheads. The identifying features of right-wing families, it contends, are that they are “inconspicuous, blond, cute and engaged”.

“First of all, [right-wing families] are nice and dedicated” Michaela Köttig, sociologist and researcher of right-wing extremism at the Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences, alleges.

Researcher of right-wing politics, Eva Prausner, says a huge danger of right-wing families is that they seem normal.

jewess

Now, I honestly wonder what a DNA ancestry test of this hideous wench would reveal? Methinks the odds of foreign blood, especially Jew, appearing is extremely high.

Because of this, she says many parents will already have established good relations with them to the point that they “are no longer marginalised and at worst, get support”.

While there are different types of right-wing families, Baby & Family asserts that daycare centres should always seek help when dealing with them.

“The right has many forms. The definition of what is extreme and what is not is difficult”, it says, but asserts that all manifestations must be dealt with because right wingers could spread their views when meeting with other parents in the playground.

Heike Radvan of the controversial Amadeu Antonio Foundation warns that “children of right-wing parents are not necessarily different from other children”, but says they are often “very obedient” and might not talk much.

Köttig explains that right-wing families are not unlike ordinary families in that they teach their own values. The important difference with extreme right-wing groups, however, is that these values are “strongly geared at Germanic customs and traditions”.

Prausner says “right-wing kids” are aware that they should keep their family lives private, but she adds that a telltale sign of right-wing extremism is that there are usually no American logos on their parents’ clothing.

quiet-baby

Wait, what? So to obey one’s parents, adhering to ancient cultural traditions, refraining from wearing trashy American clothing, and avoiding the behavior of a rampaging Google child inside Walmart qualifies as Nazi? These critters have become a pure caricature of themselves. It’s only too bad that such “scholars” and organizations are subsidized by Mama Merkel’s regime.

Oh, and here is an image of their founder and leader. Before you scroll down, just know that she’s been addressed before, and is, of course, Jewish.

anetta-kahane

Brothers, it must be admitted that Germany and its people are facing a fate that looks more and more like total and final genocide through the impact of a thousand little cuts. After generations of indoctrination, mockery, demoralization, and draconian penalties for dissent, the men and women of the former Reich no longer resemble their ancestors. Their will to fight seems spent, and their innate strength cannot forever hold against such evil Hebraic tactics.

The next few years will demonstrate whether the German Volk can summon up one last reserve of courage and anger, or whether they will go quietly into that dark Sharia night.

And we can only hope that this sort of vile propaganda fails to accomplish what its creators intended during its creation and publication.

Merkel Is A Zionist Puppet Destroying Germany With An Open Door Evil Agenda

Merkel Is A Zionist PuppetMerkelHasToGo

‘She declared war on own people’: Merkel vows to stick to open door policy, faces online uproar

‘Germany’s online community has been in a furor since Chancellor Merkel said she will still stick to an open door policy for refuges, maintaining Germany is still “safe,” despite the recent deadly attacks there, most of which were committed by migrants.

Merkel acknowledged at a news briefing on Thursday that Islamists could use the refugee flow to infiltrate Germany. She also admitted that even a “powerful country” like Germany “cannot take so many refugees in the long term.”

Yet, at the same time, she made it clear there will be no U-turn in the state’s policies with regard to migrants.’

Read more: ‘She declared war on own people’: Merkel vows to stick to open door policy, faces online uproar

Merkel’s Jews Push Mass Migration

merkeljewmassmigration

By Brother Nathanael Kapner

THE POWER OF GERMAN JEWRY has Merkel in a box. For what the Jews want, Jews get.

In a Die Welt feature article, “We Jews Know How Bitter Escape Is,” Ronald Lauder of the World Jewish Congress and Dr Josef Schuster of the Central Council of Jews in Germanyattacked Germans who oppose mass migration by non-whites as “neo-nazis.”

Applauding Germany’s progress in developing an “open society,” lauding it as “good for Jewry,” the authors then demanded Merkel to increase the flow of migrants.

Surely, the occupation of Germany by Jewmerica continues as Merkel listens to Jews morethan Germans in her pursuit of mass migration of which seventy percent are single men.

But Lauder and Schuster have a remedy for that.

By subjecting the migrants to a “re-education program” that instills “Germany’s raison d’état” in their souls, the Muslim migrants will be “Germanized” and all will be well.

Problem is, Jewry’s definition of “Germany’s raison d’état” (Read: “Jewry’s national interests”) is support of Israel and assent to the Holocaust narration.

This is a political ploy to strengthen the bond between “Germans” and “Jews” by using the migrants and their “Arab anti-Semitism” to Jewry’s advantage.

Schuster warned Merkel that “respect for the values enshrined in the Constitution (actually, The Basic Law, there is no Constitution) and agreeing that support for Israel, rejection of anti-Semitism, and remembrance of the Holocaust, is part of Germany’s DNA.”

And Merkel injects the virus and touts the script.

In a televised New Year’s address, Merkel scolded the ‘neo-nazis’ for claiming “Germanness” solely for themselves and excluding others.

Ah, that’s the Jewish line. The devil’s in the definition.

“Germanness,” according to Jewry, has nothing to do with culture, race or religion. It’s only about where you live.

Are you a Muslim living in Berlin? Then you’ll be imbued with “Germanness.” Even with mosques on every corner.

“Americanness,” according to Jewry, has nothing to do with having European roots and 2,000 years of Christian creedal history, but where you live.

Are you a Muslim living in Baton Rouge? Then you’ll be imbued with “Americanness.”

BUT WHAT’S GOOD for the geese is bad for the Jews.

Jews see themselves as JEWS FIRST, and then perchance “merkans” or “chermans.”

(Notice in the title, “Central Council of Jews in Germany,” how they don’t call themselves “Germans” but identify themselves as a nation within a nation.)

Let the fragmented masses take on a national definition, it’s really meaningless. For NO national unity exists when composed of competing minorities.

Only the Jews rise to the top in a splintered society.

And Merkel forces the Jew-ruled Germans to swallow it.

Read More: http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=1093