Tag Archives: cancer

Scary Food: Pepsi Admits Its Soda Contains Cancer-Causing Ingredients


Pepsi admits its soda contains cancer-causing ingredients

by: Isabelle Z.

Go Organic

(NaturalNews) When the Center for Environmental Health released test results showing that Pepsi intentionally covered up the presence of high levels of 4-Mel in its popular soft drinks in 2013, the company denied both the presence of this chemical in its beverages and the fact that it was dangerous. 4-Mel, which is short for 4-Methylimidazole, is a compound that is formed in the manufacturing of caramel coloring, and is a known carcinogen.

Since then, the drinks maker has fought against complying with California state requirements to place a cancer warning label on the beverages that contain the ingredient, which include not only Pepsi, but also Diet Pepsi and Pepsi One.

Now, a settlement in a class action lawsuit against Pepsi has gained preliminary approval from a federal judge in California. As part of the proposed settlement, Pepsi has agreed to ensure its caramel coloring’s 4-Mel levels do not exceed 100 parts per billion in products that are being shipped for sale within the U.S. They will also be required to test the soda using specific protocols.

The soft drink giant also agreed to these measures in a different lawsuit that was settled in a California state court last year. The new settlement, however, expands the reach of these measures from California to the entire country.

Pepsi failed to warn consumers that its drinks contain known carcinogens

The lawsuit accused Pepsi of failing to warn people that its beverages contain 4-Mel, which California has officially recognized as a cancer-causing chemical.

A 2014 Consumer Reports test showed that the 4-Mel in Pepsi exceeded the permitted level of 29 micrograms per bottle or can, which would mean that they were in violation of common law and consumer protection statutes in the state of California.

In particular, this violates California’s Proposition 65, which has been in place since 1985, and requires manufacturers to provide consumers with clear warnings when their products will expose them to toxic or cancer-causing chemicals.

The state’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment set the cutoff at 29 micrograms because that level creates a risk of cancer of one in 100,000.

Citing a 2013 Mintel and Leatherhead Food Research report, Consumer Reports said that caramel coloring is the world’s most widely used food coloring. At the time, Pepsi tried to say that because Prop 65 refers to exposure per day rather than exposure per can, and that the average amount of diet soda that its drinkers consume daily is less than a can, there was no need to place a warning on it. Consumer Reports disagreed, however.

“No matter how much consumers drink they don’t expect their beverages to have a potential carcinogen in them. And we don’t think 4-MeI should be in foods at all. Our tests of Coke samples show that it is possible to get to much lower levels,” toxicologist Dr. Urvashi Rangan said.

Is drinking soda really worth risking cancer and obesity?

It simply does not make sense for people to expose themselves unnecessarily to an ingredient that merely serves to color their food, and consumers have the right to be aware of what they are putting in their bodies. The popularity of books like Food Forensics serves to illustrate the growing desire by Americans to know what ingredients their food products contain.

Go Organic

The cancer-causing caramel coloring in Pepsi is not the only reason consumers should steer clear of it. Soft drinks are also believed to be behind the nation’s obesity epidemic. A UCLA study found that adults who consumed one sugary drink such as a soda every day had a 27 percent higher likelihood of being classified as overweight than those who did not drink such beverages. Moreover, drinking just one soda each day adds up to a total of 39 pounds of sugar each year! That means that regular soda drinkers can cut their risk of obesity and cancer in one fell swoop simply by giving up the habit for good.

Article Source: http://www.naturalnews.com/055309_Pepsi_carcinogens_4-Mel.html

Sources include:







Superfood: Just a teaspoon a day of turmeric can help fight cancer, depression and allergies

Superfood: Just a teaspoon a day of turmeric can help fight cancer, depression and allergies

Just a teaspoon a day of turmeric can help fight cancer, depression and allergies


by: Vicki Batts

(NaturalNews) Turmeric is known for its iconic yellow-orange hue and for being a staple in South Asian cuisine. It has become increasingly popular for its medicinal uses and health benefits, and is widely considered to be a “superfood.” While there are many skeptics, turmeric has been subjected to hundreds of studies and scientific experiments. Curcumin, one of the key compounds found in turmeric, has been of particular interest. Many studies of turmeric root and curcumin have yielded promising results. The drawbacks of many scientific studies is their lack of human test subjects, however.

As part of the BBC series, Trust Me I’m A Doctor, Dr. Michael Mosley and his colleagues sought to investigate what benefits, if any, turmeric might provide humans in their daily lives. To conduct their study, nearly 100 volunteers were recruited to participate in the experiment for six weeks. Most of the volunteers were between 40 and 50 years of age, and did not frequently consume curries or other turmeric-based dishes. The volunteers were then divided into three separate groups. One group would be asked to take a 1-teaspoon supplement of turmeric daily in the form of a 3.2mg capsule. Another group would also take one teaspoon of turmeric daily, but would need to incorporate it into their diet somehow. The remaining test subjects were part of the control group and were given a placebo.

Blood tests were taken before the experiment began, and following its conclusion. The researchers examined the methylation of the volunteers’ genes, and also utilized a new testing method recently developed by Dr. Martin Widschwendter from University College, London, for analyzing how well their blood cells were combating inflammation. For the Daily Mail, Dr. Mosley writes: “The hope was this would give us an idea of how well their immune systems were performing.”

What the researchers found was quite astonishing. While the placebo and supplement groups showed very little difference, the group of test subjects who added turmeric to food exhibited substantial changes. This finding is not actually all that surprising, however. The Health Minded notes that curcumin is a fat-soluble compound, so consuming it with other foods that contain fat is said to help boost absorption. Studies have found that consuming turmeric with black pepper also boosts nutrient absorption significantly. BBC News writes that many of the participants chose to combine their turmeric with warm milk or yogurt.

Professor Widschwendter told the Daily Mail: “We could see changes to a gene associated with cancer, depression and allergies such as asthma.” The new testing methodology that he has developed is able to analyze not just the genes, but how hard they are working. Professor Widschwendter adds: “The test looks at the changes in the packaging, known as methylation, that allows us to predict the risk of certain diseases, depending on which genes are affected and where the genes are affected.”

While Widschwendter noted that the changes they looked at were only those in the blood, and may not represent what was going on in bodily tissues, he nevertheless seemed excited about the results. The professor noted: “However, the results were fascinating. We showed turmeric is able to reset important components of our gene’s software.”

One possible mechanism behind turmeric’s benefits may be that it changes the way that the enzymes involved with methylation behave. One thing is for sure though: The health benefits of turmeric root are not to be underestimated.





Article Source: http://www.naturalnews.com/055407_turmeric_preventing_cancer_depression.html

Scary Foods: 7 Cancer Causing Foods You Should Stop Eating

7 Cancer Causing Foods You Should Stop Eating


By bullseye

According to the World Health Organization, cancer is one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide. Around a third of cancer deaths are caused by five key lifestyle risks: alcohol use, tobacco use, lack of physical activity, high body mass index, and low fruit and vegetable intake. In addition, the Preventable Cancer Foundation says only five percent of cancers are hereditary, so lifestyle choices have an enormous impact on overall cancer risk.

All of this is good news. It means you have far more control over your chances of getting cancer than you might think. And while making sure you have an adequate intake of things like fruits and vegetables, there are also foods you should avoid to decrease your risk of developing cancer.

There have been countless studies attempting to link certain foods to an increased or decreased risk of cancer. Cancer.net says the connection between a specific food and cancer can be difficult to establish because there can be complicating factors, such as interactions between the different foods and drinks people consume, and how a food is prepared may influence its risk or benefits.

However, there are some foods you should steer clear of, just to be on the safe side.


1. Processed Meat

Processed meats include hot dogs, luncheon meats, bacon, sausages, and other meats that are cured, salted, smoked or preserved in some way (i.e. meats that aren’t sold ‘fresh’).

There is very strong evidence that processed meats are carcinogenic, according to the International Agency for Research on Cancer, and the consumption of processed meat is known to cause colorectal cancer – the higher the consumption, the higher the risk.

The mechanisms by which processed meat causes cancer is not yet understood, but may be related to N-nitroso compounds produced when heme (from hemoglobin) in the meat is broken down and generated by nitrate preservatives. N-nitroso compounds have been shown to damage cells that line the bowel.

2. Refined Sugar/Sodas

Too much refined sugar causes a range of responses in the body that may indirectly increase the risk of cancer.

Sugar causes insulin spikes, which may lead to increased fat storage, and excess body fat increases your risk of several different cancers, according to the American Cancer Society. Being overweight or obese is also a risk factor for type 2 diabetes, which has been associated with breast, colon, and pancreatic cancers. In addition, the American Diabetes Association says regular consumption of sugary drinks has been linked to type 2 diabetes.

A study on mice models, published in Cancer Research earlier this year, has shown dietary sugar intake has a direct impact on breast cancer development and metastasis.


3. GMOs

Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) have been at the center of food safety debates for years, and of the most controversial are the ‘Round Up Ready’ crops. These crops have been engineered to withstand large doses of glyphosate (the key ingredient in Monsanto’s herbicide Roundup), which means when you ingest food from a Roundup Ready crop, you’ll likely be getting a dose of the Roundup it’s been sprayed with too.

A study republished in Environmental Sciences Europe in 2014 (after a controversial retraction due to commercial pressure) compared the effects of feeding rats Roundup-tolerant GM maize (cultivated with or without Roundup) or given Roundup alone in drinking water. All developed significant health problems over a two-year period compared with controls. All treatment groups had higher rates of tumor development.

4. Microwave Popcorn

The popcorn’s not the problem, it’s the bag it comes in. Many microwave popcorn bags contain a chemical called perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA). PFOA causes liver, testicular, and pancreatic tumors in rats and is associated with kidney and testicular cancer in people exposed to it in drinking water, due to chemical plant emissions.


5. Farmed Salmon

Farmed salmon are treated with a range of chemicals including fungicides and antibiotics and even artificial color to make their flesh appear more ‘salmon pink.’

A study of organic contaminants in farmed Atlantic salmon compared with wild Pacific salmon revealed the farmed salmon had elevated levels of dioxin and dioxin-like compounds, PCBs, pesticides, and other toxins, some of which are known to increase the risk of cancer. Scientists concluded that the risksof eating farmed Atlantic salmon outweighed the benefits, especially for children, and pregnant or nursing women.


6. Hydrogenated Oils

Hydrogenation is the process whereby hydrogen is used to convert unsaturated fat in liquid form toa solid form, which results in trans fats being produced. Hydrogenated oils are found in things like margarine, vegetable shortening, premade baked goods, and fried foods.

Trans fats have been linked to several diseases including cancer, diabetes, and stroke. A study of around 20,000 women showed increased levels of trans-monounsaturated fatty acids in the blood, presumably due to a high intake of processed foods, increased risk of invasive breast cancer.

7. Canned Foods

Bisphenol A (BPA) is found in some plastics and is used to line food cans. BPA is a synthetic estrogen, which disrupts the body’s natural hormones.

BPA has been shown to increase the risk of mammary cancers in animals, and a study published in 2014 found that BPA disrupts the genes defending against breast cancer growth. BPA has also been linked to prostate cancer and BPA levels in urine may help predict prostate cancer in men.

This article (7 Cancer Causing Foods You Should Stop Eating) is a free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commonslicense with attribution to the author Bullseye and AnonHQ.com. Image: Pixabay

New Study: Very Hot Drinks May Cause Cancer

New Study: Very Hot Drinks May Cause CancerAccording to a new review, leading experts warn that drinking very hot beverages may lead to cancer. How hot is too hot?

Very Hot Drinks May Cause Cancer by Buzz60
Detox Foot Pads™ harness the unique power of reflexology to access 60 acupuncture points, naturally promoting powerful detox to strengthen your body.

Beyonce, Justin Timberlake and other celebs paid MILLIONS to endorse cancer-causing junk foods

Beyonce, Justin Timberlake and other celebs paid MILLIONS to endorse cancer-causing junk foods


by: J. D. Heyes

(NaturalNews) Once you become a celebrity, especially in the entertainment and sports industries, it’s difficult not to make money. That’s because companies fall all over themselves to ink deals endorsement deals with you; the younger and hotter and more popular you are – a great demographic for many products – the more these companies will want to sign you up and use your celebrity to help them sell products.

Imagine, for instance, signing a $50 million to promote Pepsi products? Or $6 million just to utter three words on behalf of McDonald’s, “I’m lovin’ it”? Beyonce managed the first deal; Justin Timberlake the second.

In fact, a recent study published in the journal Pediatrics described lucrative endorsement deals of 65 music celebrities, most of them hawking some of junkiest of junk foods and unhealthiest of sugary drinks.

Stars like Maroon 5, Britney Spears, Timberlake and others promoted 57 different food and beverage brands that ranged from Pop-Tarts to Pepsi, energy drinks to pizza.

“We found the vast majority of food and beverage products were unhealthy,” said researcher Marie Bragg of New York University, as reported by NPR.

‘Television advertising influences children’

The study did not examine what impact celebrity endorsements had on product consumption rates. However, she pointed to one anecdote that may help define the potential influence of well-known stars, involving rapper Pittbull’s endorsement of Dr. Pepper.

“When Dr. Pepper asked Pitbull to endorse, they got 4.6 million advertising impressions, and sales went up 1.7 percent [among Latinos] — despite declining sales in the overall soft drink category,” Bragg told NPR.

The public broadcaster states further:

As we’ve reported, musicians can influence the thinking — and perhaps the habits — of their young fans. A study published last year found that teens and young adults who reported enjoying hit songs that referenced brands of alcohol (think Kesha and her bottle of Jack) were more likely to drink compared with those who didn’t like these songs.

The 9 Step Body Cleanse Kit from Global Healing Center includes everything you need to thoroughly detoxify your body and take control of your health.Also, NPR noted, in reference to food and non-alcoholic drink choices, TV is very influential and that has been well-documented. The Institute of Medicine concluded nearly a decade ago that “television advertising influences children to prefer and request high-calorie and low-nutrient foods and beverages.”

That said, many in the food industry have promised to scale back marketing aimed at kids aged 12 and younger. More than a dozen of the biggest food companies including Coca-Cola. Kellogg’s and McDonald’s have joined the Children’s Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative, which seeks to limit kids’ exposure to unhealthy products.

Now, however, pressure has mounted for companies to curb marketing of many products to teenagers who are in very critical stages of health development. Experts say that the rising incidence of obesity is clear reason to push for these changes since rates among teens are rising exponentially. Bad eating habits early on only leads to bad habits – and premature health issues – later in life, experts say.

“Given that we have a childhood and teen obesity problem in the country, [these endorsements of unhealthy foods] are sending the wrong message to young people, and likely contributing to poor dietary habits,” Bragg told NPR.

Of course using famous people works to sell products – or ideas

TV, film and music stars are part of that equation, given their endorsements.

While Bragg’s study did not assess any link to dietary habits, she nevertheless said that “we do know that exposure to food ads leads young people to overeat products they see.”

Naturally the food industry is pushing back, saying there is a dearth of evidence to suggest that what they’re doing – hiring celebrities to hawk their products – is swaying teens one way or the other. But claiming that negates any logical reason to pay millions to celebrities for their endorsement; if the celebrity isn’t going to help them sell their product, why pay them?

The Partnership for a Healthier America knows that celebrities sell, which is why they are using them to help push a fruit-and-vegetables campaign. The group has endorsements from NFL quarterback Cam Newton, Jessica Alba, Kristen Bell and others.

“We are absolutely taking a play from a playbook that works,” Drew Nannis, chief marketing officer of the partnership, told NPR. He added that it is well-known that celebrities help sell – ideas or products.





Major New Study Reveals Cellphone Radiation Causes Cancer

Cellphone Radiation Causes Cancer

Major New Study Reveals Cellphone Radiation Causes Cancer

After years of inconclusive results, a massive study has linked radio frequencies with malignant tumors.

More dreaded news on the healthcare front this week, as a study released Thursday confirmed what most people already feared: radio-frequency radiation—the kind used in television broadcasting, satellite communications, and of course, cell phones—causes cancer.

The $25 million study, conducted over two and a half years by the U.S. National Toxicology Program, found significantly higher instances of two types of malignant tumors on male rats exposed to the same radio-frequency radiation currently used in the United States. Christopher Portier, former head of the NTP who commissioned the study, said the levels of radiation were “not very different” from what humans are currently exposed to via cell phones.

“This is by far—far and away—the most carefully done cell phone bioassay, a biological assessment. This is a classic study that is done for trying to understand cancers in humans,” Portier said. “There will have to be a lot of work after this to assess if it causes problems in humans, but the fact that you can do it in rats will be a big issue. It actually has me concerned, and I’m an expert.”

Researchers found that as the levels of radio-frequency radiation increased, more rats developed rare cancers in their brains (called gliomas) and heart (called schwannomas), while none of the control rats developed those two diseases. As the Consumerist notes, “these results seem to support earlier findings from epidemiological studies, which found the same kinds of tumors in humans.”

“This study in mice and rats is under review by additional experts,” a spokesman for the National Institute of Health said. “It is important to note that previous human, observational data collected in earlier, large-scale population-based studies have found limited evidence of an increased risk for developing cancer from cell phone use.”

The Federal Communications Commission, which has long considered studies on the link between radio waves and cancer “inconclusive,” released a statement Thursday:

“We are aware that the National Toxicology Program is studying this important issue. Scientific evidence always informs FCC rules on this matter. We will continue to follow all recommendations from federal health and safety experts including whether the FCC should modify its current policies and RF exposure limits.”

Elizabeth Preza is an AlterNet staff writer focusing on politics, media and cultural criticism. Follow her on Twitter @lizacisms.

Opinion By Jack Allen – Why I Complained To Nestle About Their Lean Cuisine Scary Chicken


Opinion By Jack Allen: Why I Complained To Nestle About Their Lean Cuisine Scary Chicken.

Tags: Scary Chicken, Processed Chicken, Food, Bad Food, Health, Lean Cuisine, Nestle, Carrageenan, cancer, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s

The Chinese government has admitted to ‘cancer villages’

The Chinese government has admitted to ‘cancer villages’ where the cancer rate is significantly higher than the national average.Tags: china, china cancer village, cancer, pollution, environment, chinease environment, smog, china smog, world news, News