Category Archives: World News

Scary Tech? Robots Are About To Change Everything

Robots Are About To Change Everything

By Bruce Horovitz

mcdonalds-robotsWhen I was a kid, I was mesmerized by all things robotic. For a special birthday gift, my grandmother surprised me with a shiny, plastic-and-tin Robert the Robot toy. When I first looked at this gift in the box through the clear plastic wrap, I suspected a small miracle had just happened. Then, when I took it out of the box and turned the crank attached to its remote control, Robbie, as I affectionately called him, not only started to walk, but his eyes lit up a fiery red, too. I was convinced that the Red Sea had just parted.

Fast-forward about 50 years, and guess what: Robbie is alive, well, and serving frozen yogurt. Well, not exactly. But a company dubbed Fresh Healthy Vending is betting that it can successfully combine the consumer appeal of better-for-you frozen yogurt with the wide-eyed performance appeal of a robot-like machine—dubbed the Reis & Irvy’s Fro-Yo Kiosk—dishing out fro-yo that consumers can personalize with their favorite toppings.

“It’s one of the first direct experiences that most consumers will have with a robot,” says Nick Yates, chairman of Fresh Healthy Vending.

Indeed, the big sales pitch isn’t so much the frozen yogurt but the robotic machine that sells it. The robotic arm delicately removes a cup from its cup holder, places it in the yogurt dispenser, dispenses one of nine flavors, and then moves along to several toppings (customers can choose two of six). For 6 ounces of yogurt, some toppings, and, of course, the one-minute show, folks pay $3.50, or $4.50 for 8 ounces.

The robotic yogurt contraption was officially unveiled at the International Franchise Expo in New York City in June. Executives claim it’s the first fully automated frozen-yogurt robot to market.

It’s a far cry from Pinkberry, Red Mango, or sweetFrog. And it might sound a bit goofy to some. But in one form or another, robots of all sorts are showing up across fast food and retail. Ordering kiosks, some that act almost robotic, have popped up everywhere from McDonald’s to Sheetz as companies try to reduce labor costs and speed up service. Several vendors at this year’s National Restaurant Association Show featured kitchen robots ready to prepare everything from french fries to salads. Even Taco Bell is beta testing something called TacoBot, which is an artificially intelligent chat bot that not only takes orders via consumer apps, but also suggests order upgrades. And now there’s a robotic fro-yo machine.

Detractors have their doubts that a robot can revolutionize something like frozen yogurt. “I think it’s a desperate grab by fro-yo,” says Peter Madden, president and CEO of AgileCat, a branding specialty firm. What’s more, Madden says, the fro-yo world’s “brand positioning has never been rooted in the future and technology.”

But robots aren’t such a crazy idea in today’s foodservice world. With $15 minimum wages established in several states and cities, a fro-yo-scooping robot would have some relevance—though top executives at San Diego-based Fresh Healthy Vending say cost savings aren’t the driver at all. “The product is a show stopper,” Yates says. “The robotic arm is a novelty that stops people in their tracks. Kids go absolutely crazy for it.”

He’s seen it first-hand. An earlier version of the robotic yogurt machine continues to attract crowds at the Houston Space Center. A more recent version, at a trampoline park in Puerto Rico, is an even bigger hit, he says. And within the next 12 months, the company hopes to sell at least 50 more units to franchise owners nationally. All the machine really needs is 12 square feet of space, a 220-volt plug, and, yes, someone to tend to it.

While there’s no need for a human being to serve the product, someone has to maintain the equipment, which includes a 90-minute top-to-bottom cleaning every week. So the robotic machine isn’t a job killer, Yates says, which is how many people view robotic innovations in foodservice.

A robotic machine could help bring more excitement to the frozen-yogurt industry, which has seen expansion slow in the last couple of years. While the industry grew at a 18.2 percent clip in the five-year period leading up to 2015, according to market research firm IBISWorld, it will continue to grow at a far more conservative 5 percent annual rate in the years leading up to 2020.

Still, 5 percent counts as room to grow. And Yates predicts a robot vending machine could be just the thing to satisfy that potential.

“Robotics is the next generation of vending,” he says. “Yes, there’s a huge element of novelty and gimmickry to this, but that’s the way things are evolving.”

Madden, the consultant, says that while Millennials will post images and videos on Instagram and Snapchat of themselves using these robot machines, it will only be a passing trend “before they move on to the next thing.”

Not so, says Yates, who insists that impulsive purchases from machines like fro-yo robots will only grow—particularly in well-placed areas like tourist destinations, universities, and even hospitals.

Just six months ago, Nick Wright, Fresh Healthy Vending’s director of operations, was at Primary Children’s Hospital in Salt Lake City, where one of the early versions of the machine had been placed. But Wright wasn’t there because of the machine. He was there for the birth of his son, Oliver, who was born seven weeks premature and needed special attention.

Wright spent many days at the hospital, and during that time observed first-hand how children at the hospital—many with life-threatening illnesses—reacted to the robotic fro-yo maker.

Wright remembers one young boy in particular who was wheeled into the vending area. As soon as the boy saw the robotic fro-yo machine, “he was able to zone everything else out,” Wright says. “A massive smile appeared on the boy’s face.”

It was, of course, the boy’s Robert the Robot moment. For him, with the whirl of a shiny, robotic arm and a splash of M&M-topped fro-yo, the Red Sea parted.

A Sick Satanic Rabbi – New Israeli IDF Chief Rabbi Says It Is Permissible To Rape During War


Hellstorm – Exposing The Real Genocide of Nazi Germany (Full)


The Secret Behind Communism

Israeli rabbi who advocated rape of ‘comely gentile women’ during war becomes chief army rabbi



Just on my way to my flight from Israel’s Ben Gurion Airport, I noticed this cover headline in the Yediot Aharonot newspaper front page:

“New IDF Chief Rabbi: It is permissible to rape during war”. Under that: “Col. Eyal Qarim has declared in the past “draft of girls is totally forbidden” – and claimed that in times of war it is permissible for soldiers to “have sex with comely gentile women against their will”.

I have followed the case of Qarim for quite a while. In fact, some three weeks ago I drafted an article covering the history of Qarim’s violent advocacy since 2003. Though at that point the story seemed not to be current, just yesterday those fears concerning Qarim’s possible influence were confirmed: Qarim was promoted from head of the IDF Rabbinate to IDF Chief Rabbi. Below is my drafted article.

The story of the IDF Chief Rabbi Col. Eyal Qarim and his opinions about rape in times of war is one that comes up occasionally in the media, as it again has done recently for example here, and cited on other sources. Lately, a contact asked me whether I could look at the Hebrew sources and confirm that there is no mistranslation.

Front page of Yediot with Qarim appointment, controversy

I am familiar with this case, and not only is there no mistranslation as such – there is a continuation of the story which seems to have gained no local (Israeli) nor international scrutiny, till now, and I think it deserves it. In order to understand the seriousness of the whole story, a certain historical overview is necessary:

The story has mainly come to be noticed due to Yossi Gurvitz’s article in March 2012titled “IDF colonel-rabbi implies: Rape is permitted in war”, where he notes an answer that Qarim, not in uniform at the point, gave to a concerned reader of a religious publication called Kipa asking about rape in times of war, opining that “prohibitions against immorality” are removed during war. Part of Qarim’s answer:

“[W]ar removes some of the prohibitions on sexual relations, and even though fraternizing with a gentile woman is a very serious matter, it was permitted during wartime (under the specific terms) out of understanding for the hardship endured by the warriors. And since the success of the whole at war is our goal, the Torah permitted the individual to satisfy the evil urge, under the conditions mentioned, for the purpose of the success of the whole.”

This was noticed in the Sheldon Adelson owned NRG and on Mondoweiss, both a day after Gurvitz’s post.

Gurvitz was making the point that although Qarim posted his answer in 2003, when he was out of uniform (Qarim had served as a combat soldier and commander in an elite IDF unit), he was in 2012 a commander in the military rabbinate, and considered for the post of Chief Military Rabbi.

Gurvitz asked the IDF Spokesman the following questions:

  1. Is the rape of women during wartime agreeable to the IDF Ethics Code?
  2. If not, why does a prominent military rabbi promote it?
  3. If not, does the IDF intend to end the service of Col. Qarim, or bring charges against him?
  4. How does the IDF Spokesman intend to deal with the anticipated damage to its image in the international arena, resulting from Col. Qarim’s ruling?

There was a response, as Gurvitz notes: “Frankly, I did not expect an answer, but surprisingly enough an enraged officer from IDF Spokesman New Media Unit called me. His official response was that Qarim was not an officer in active service when he wrote that ruling, and furthermore that my question ‘disrespects the IDF, the State of Israel and the Jewish religion,’ and hence his unit will no longer answer my questions.”

Apparently this exposure became a PR nuisance for the IDF, so the day after Gurvitz’s article came out, Qarim issued a “clarification” on the same religious website, Kipa (in Hebrew).

It is this clarification which is so interesting in terms of currency and as an addition to the story, because here is the military rabbi in uniform, and this is how he tries to backpedal. The response article is headlined:

“Rabbi Qarim clarifies: of course rape is not permitted in any situation – by halacha (religious ruling). Head of the Rabbinate Department answers activists from the left who have taken his words out of context. In clarification of the halachic (religious ruling) answer that he gave on Kipa [2003], Rabbi Qarim says “of course the Torah never allowed rape of a woman”.

Let us scrutinize how exactly Qarim gets out of this one:

Of course the Torah never allowed rape of a woman. The ruling of “comely woman” [Deuteronomy 21] is meant to cause a soldier to retreat from his intention to take the [female] prisoner to be his wife, through a series of acts which moderate her beauty and accentuate her personality and her sorrow. If, after the whole process he still wishes to marry her, he must do this through Hupa [religious ceremony] and blessings…. In addition, the whole essence of the ruling was to refine the situation which was prevalent in the barbaric world of wars that was existent then, where any soldier was permitted to do as he pleased with the prisoner, and the purpose of the ruling is to prevent a soldier from taking the prisoner as wife in the heat of battle. It is clear that in our days, the world has advanced to a level of morality where prisoners are not taken to be married, of course this ruling is not to be carried out as written, as it is also in total opposition to the values and orders of the army.

Now it is necessary to scrutinize the original text and what was originally asked on the first Kipa article in 2003. The inquirer asked specifically: “How is it then, that it was told to me by a rabbi, that a comely woman can be [raped], according to some of the [Halachic] rulers, also before the whole process described in the Torah? That is, that [a man would] surrender to his desires, and have sex with her, and only later take her to her home etc.?”

Indeed, the text of the Torah is worrying in its formulation. Let us have a look at it. This is Deuteronomy 21:10-14:

“When you go out to battle against your enemies, and the LORD your God delivers them into your hands and you take them away captive, and see among the captives a beautiful woman, and have a desire for her and would take her as a wife for yourself, then you shall bring her home to your house, and she shall shave her head and trim her nails. She shall also remove the clothes of her captivity and shall remain in your house, and mourn her father and mother a full month; and after that you may go in to her and be her husband and she shall be your wife. It shall be, if you are not pleased with her, then you shall let her go wherever she wishes”.

Indeed, the section is somewhat confusing – because the first “take her as a wife” that appears, and even more so in Hebrew וְלָקַחְתָּ לְךָ לְאִשָּׁה , could well be translated as an act of rape, in that the literal translation can be “and you took her as your woman”, in a “surrender to desires” as the inquirer puts it. Though the acts that follow are relating to the more formal question of marriage.

This is the very specific matter that the inquirer had asked about, and Qarim did not really answer it. Instead, he essentially explained how as the “success of the whole at war is our goal, the Torah permitted the individual to satisfy the evil urge”. As NRG noted, Qarim did not say “no, it is not permitted”.

But when pressed to backpedal, Qarim applied a novel technique. He addresses the rape issue in the Torah very lightly (“Of course the Torah never allowed rape of a woman”), but then goes to address another issue – the formal issue of the marriage – as if the two were one and the same. What he then regards as the “problem” that the Torah supposedly tries to tackle, is the actual ceremonial marriage – not the rape. So Qarim is saying that the problem is taking a decision to marry a prisoner “in the heat of battle”. Thus he now tackles a whole other matter, saying “it is clear that in our days, the world has advanced to a level of morality where prisoners are not taken to be married. Of course this ruling is not to be carried out as written, as it is also in total opposition to the values and orders of the army”.

But this is a straw man. The inquirer did not ask about marriage, but about rape, and noted that some rabbinical authorities have opined that the ruling could be about what to do after the “surrender to desires”. In his 2003 answer, Qarim was focusing on the rape issue, justifying it in historical terms, and not answering the question specifically in address of our times, as was asked.

Qarim provides very ambiguous answers, which in their focus may leave the reader confused. In 2003 he seemed to imply that rape is permitted for Jews in times of war (he did not make the explicit distinction between biblical times and now), and in his “clarification” he addressed marriage, not rape.

This ambivalence, straw-man-argumentation and obfuscation are very worrying. In the darkness of ambivalence, one could indeed be worried that soldiers, particularly those heeding rabbinical opinions, would be confused. And who knows what a confused soldier “in the heat of battle” could come to do with a Palestinian woman.

NRG noted in its article that “it’s now clear who Erez Efrati learned from”. Erez Efrati is an IDF Officer, the bodyguard of the Chief in Staff, who was convicted of rape and who told the Supreme Court in 2011 that the reason he attacked the young woman was because “he acted as if she was a terrorist”. NRG also notes the opinion of Tzfat chief rabbi Shmuel Eliayhu, also cited from the Kipa site:

“If IDF soldiers do not satisfy their evil lusts, they may lose the war, and then the enemy soldiers will rape our women. In other words, we are talking about rape as a protective measure”.

Thus it seems that rape in times of war is a rather contentious issue amongst Rabbis, even IDF Rabbis. “No” doesn’t necessarily mean “no”, violent attack can be considered as “protective measure”. One wonders whether the “barbaric world of wars” that Qarim refers to is actually distant history.

Postscript: In response to some outrage from a few politicians from the left and heads of women’s rights organizations in Israel, the IDF Spokesman is quoted in Yediot Aharonot today stating: “Col. Qarim seeks to clarify that his words were uttered only in regards to a Halachic interpretation question, but in no way as an answer to a practical question. Rabbi Qarim never wrote, said or even thought that an IDF soldier is permitted to sexually assault a woman during war – whoever interprets his words otherwise is mistaken and deceiving. Rabbi Qarim’s moral attitude can be witnessed in his long service in the military in various command posts, in combat and as well as rabbinical functions, where he has demonstrated total loyalty to the values of the IDF and the spirit of the IDF, especially values of human dignity towards all.”

But this is essentially the backpedaling that Qarim already attempted in 2012. As I have shown above, it is rather unconvincing.

Bizarre Oddities: Pokemon GO Is Massive MIND CONTROL? – Total Control Over You

PROOF "Pokemon GO" Is Massive MIND CONTROL! (2016)
PROOF “Pokemon GO” Is Massive MIND CONTROL! (2016)

Bizarre Oddities: Pokemon GO Is Massive MIND CONTROL? – Total Control Over You

“Don’t Blame The White Man” Terrence Williams Going Off On Black Lives Matter Goes Viral

p style=”text-align: center;”>WhiteMan“Don’t Blame The White Man” Terrence Williams Going Off On Black Lives Matter Goes Viral

WTF? Michelle Obama And George Bush Dancing And Smiling During Dallas Memorial Service

Bush-Obama-WTFWTF? Michelle Obama And George Bush Dancing And Smiling During Dallas Memorial Service

Zionist Controlled Media Is Covering Up Black On White Crime – Lindsey’s Story

Black Mob Attack in Kansas a Cautionary Tale for Whites
Black Mob Attack in Kansas a Cautionary Tale for Whites

Zionist Controlled Media Is Covering Up Black On White Crime

Randy Robbins reached out to AMERICAN FREE PRESS on June 11 when he left a comment on the AFP website under a May 28, 2012 article entitled “Media Covers Up Black Hate Crimes Against Whites” by Pete Papaherakles which proves, in painful detail, how the mainstream media almost completely ignores black-on-white crime, but spends days, weeks and sometimes months on the comparatively minuscule numbers of white-on-black crime.

Mr. Robbins explained in his comment that his daughter, Lindsey Gann, who coaches a girls 14-and-under softball team in Topeka, Kansas, “had confronted several children for hitting and bullying other younger kids,” which prompted several black parents to make racial comments and threaten to attack her.

Dave Gahary spoke with Randy and Lindsey’s husband Jeremy about the attack on Lindsey by a black mob, in this disturbing interview

Video: 1 of 2

Video Below 2 of 2

Beyoncé Is So Proud Of Being Black That She’s Bleaching Her Skin To Become White

BeyonceWantsToBeWhiteBeyoncé Is So Proud Of Being Black That She’s Bleaching Her Skin To Become White

By Paul Joseph Watson
Beyoncé is a complete hypocrite who has exploited ‘Black Lives Matter’ riot chic to inflate her already mammoth ego and bank balance.

Beyoncé is so ‘proud’ of being black that she’s physically bleaching her skin to become white.

F**k Beyoncé.

The Escalating Danger To White People In The USA By Crazed Black Racists? Evil Thugs Celebrate Killing Whites

DangerToWhitesThe Escalating Danger To White People In The USA By Crazed Black Racists? Evil Thugs Celebrate Killing Whites
The escalating danger to white people and the promotion of hatred and violence. The truth abut “Black Lives Matter” and the media incitement.

Dr. David Duke exposes the waging of a war on whites & that he authorized a campaign committee to consider a run for U.S. Congress against sell-out Steve Scalise!

Today Dr. Duke spoke to the rash of murderous violence aimed at police across the country due to baseless accusations of racism in recent confrontations with uncooperative black suspects. He underscored how this is symptomatic of the pervasive anti-white narrative spun by the elite that incites hatred and violence among blacks.


He also revealed that he has been urged by enormous numbers of people his district to run for United States Congress. With the country coming apart at the seams and no one willing to really speak the truth about what is happening, the majority population in this country needs someone who will actually give voice to their interests in the face of an increasingly violent hatefest launched by the media and political establishment against them.

Huge False Flag Cover-Up: Israel Murdered And Napalmed US Sailors

Images Used Via Youtube Video.

An Attempt to Drag America Into Israel’s War

Israel Murders 34 Americans on USS Liberty Attack, Lyndon Johnson Wanted Entire Crew Dead

USS Liberty 1967: Israel Murdered U.S. Sailors and Tried to Sink Their Ship … A Failed False Flag Attack Against the U.S.

By Washington’s Blog

On June 8, 1967, Israel attacked the American naval vessel USS Liberty in international waters, and tried to sink it.

After checking the Liberty out for 8 hours – and making 9 overflights with Israeli jets, within 200 feet … close enough for the pilots and the sunbathing Liberty sailors on deck to waive at each other.

Yet the Israelis attacked it with Mirage fighter jets, torpedoes and napalm. The USS Liberty suffered 70% casualties, with 34 killed and 174 wounded.

The Israeli attack spanned two hours … as long as the attack on Pearl Harbor. The air attack alone lasted approximately 25 minutes: consisting of more than 30 sorties by approximately 12 separate planes using napalm, cannon, and rockets which left 821 holes in the ship. The Israelis fired 30mm cannons and rockets into the boat.

Following the attack by fighter jets, three Israeli motor torpedo boats torpedoed the ship, causing a 40 x 40 foot wide hole in her hull, and machine-gunning firefighters and stretcher-bearers attempting to save their ship and crew. More than 3,000 machine-gun bullet holes were later counted on the Liberty’s hull.

After the attack was thought to have ended, three life rafts were lowered into the water to rescue the most seriously wounded. The Israeli torpedo boats returned and machine-gunned these life rafts at close range. This was followed by the approach of two large Israeli Army assault helicopters filled with armed commandos carrying what appeared to be explosive satchels (they departed after hovering over the ship for several minutes, making no attempt to communicate).

The Israelis clearly knew it was an American ship, tried to sink it, and tried to frame the Egyptians for the attack, as shown by the following evidence:

(1) The Liberty was flying a huge, brand new American flag. The flag was 5-by-8 feet. The weather conditions were ideal to ensure the flag’s easy observance and identification, because it was clear and sunny, with a wind-speed which make for a constant ripple in the flag. After the flag was shot up by the jets, the Liberty’s crew replaced it with a 7-by-13 foot American flag, which flew during the entire duration of the attack.

(2) The Liberty had a unique profile and didn’t look like any other boat, since it had more and bigger antennas – including large, high-tech dishes and giant towers – than any other boat in the world (it was an NSA spy ship).

(3) The Liberty was marked with uniquely American numbering and colors in front.

(4) The Israeli pilots shot out the Liberty’s communications equipment first, and specifically jammed the ship’s emergency radio signal … unique to American naval vessels in the 6th Fleet. The ships from other fleets and other nations used different frequencies, which the Israelis did not jam.

(5) The Israelis used unmarked fighter jets and unmarked torpedo boats during the attack.

(6) Recently-declassified radio transcripts between the Israeli attack forces and ground control show that – at least 3 times – an Israeli fighter jet pilot identified the craft as American, and asked whether ground control was sure he should attack. Ground control repeatedly said, yes, attack the vessel.

(7) The Israeli torpedo boats methodically destroyed all of the Liberty’s liferafts one by one (which is a war crime).

(8) The only reason the Israelis did not successfully sink the Liberty and kill all of its crewmen was that one sailor duck-taped together antennae – and took many bullet wounds in the process – which enabled an emergency SOS to get out from the Liberty to American 6th Fleet.

(9) The Israelis later claimed that they mistook the Liberty for an Egyptian vessel. But the Egyptian ship – the El Quseir – was an unarmed 1920s-era horse carrier out of service in Alexandria, four times smaller than the Liberty, which bore virtually no resemblance to the Liberty.

(10) President Lyndon Johnson believed the attack was intentional and he leaked his opinion to Newsweek.

Other high-level Americans agreed:

“I was never satisfied with the Israeli explanation…. Through diplomatic channels we refused to accept their explanations. I didn’t believe them then, and I don’t believe them to this day. The attack was outrageous.”
–U.S. Secretary of State Dean Rusk

“The evidence was clear. Both Adm. Kidd and I believed with certainty that this attack … was a deliberate effort to sink an American ship and murder its entire crew…. Not only did the Israelis attack the ship with napalm, gunfire, and missiles, Israeli torpedo boats machine-gunned three lifeboats that had been launched in an attempt by the crew to save the most seriously wounded — a war crime….”
–Affidavit of U.S. Navy Captain Ward Boston, the legal counsel for the official investigation into the Liberty attack

“There is compelling evidence that Israel’s attack was a deliberate attempt to destroy an American ship and kill her entire crew.”
–Admiral Thomas Moorer, Chief of Naval Operations and later Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, 14 January 2004

“Israeli authorities subsequently apologized for the incident, but few in Washington could believe that the ship had not been identified as an American naval vessel…. I have yet to understand why it was felt necessary to attack this ship or who ordered the attack.”
–C.I.A. Chief Richard Helms

“Yet the ultimate lesson of the Liberty attack had far more effect on policy in Israel than in America. Israel’s leaders concluded that nothing they might do would offend the Americans to the point of reprisal. If America’s leaders did not have the courage to punish Israel for the blatant murder of American citizens, it seemed clear that their American friends would let them get away with almost anything.”
–George Ball, U.S. Undersecretary of State at the time, The Passionate Attachment

(Sources: Congressional record and videos shown below.)

Admiral Thomas H. Moorer – former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff – chaired a non-governmental investigation into the attack on the USS Liberty in 2003. The committee – which included General of Marines Raymond G. Davis, Rear Admiral Merlin Staring, former Judge Advocate General of the Navy, and former U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia James E. Akins – held Israel to be culpable and suggested several theories for Israel’s possible motives, including the desire to blame Egypt and bring the U.S. into the Six Day War.

Indeed, President Lyndon Johnson dispatched nuclear-armed fighter jets to drop nuclear bombs on Cairo, Egypt. They were only recalled at the last minute, when Johnson realized that it was the Israelis – and not the Egyptians – who had fired on the Liberty.

An NSA report from 1981 found:

A persistent question relating to the Liberty incident is whether or not the Israeli forces which attacked the ship knew that it was American . . . not a few of the Liberty’s crewmen and [deleted but probably “NSA’s G Group”] staff are convinced that they did. Their belief derived from consideration of the long time the Israelis had the ship under surveillance prior to the attack, the visibility of the flag, and the intensity of the attack itself.

Speculation as to the Israeli motivation varied. Some believed that Israel expected thatthe complete destruction of the ship and killing of the personnel would lead the U.S. to blame the UAR [Egypt] for the incident and bring the U.S. into the war on the side of Israel . . . others felt that Israeli forces wanted the ship and men out of the way.


Scouring the Liberty records in the LBJ Library in Texas, Ennes [an officer on the bridge of the Liberty] stumbled upon a smoking gun – a one-page memo of the minutes of the 303 Committee [the U.S. National Security Council group that reviewed sensitive intelligence operations] held in advance of the war in April 1967. The Committee consisted of a handful of top level intelligence and government officials who examined black operations and devised plausible deniability for the executive branch in the event of public discovery of an attack. The memo relates to a clandestine joint US-Israeli effort to blame Egypt for the sinking of the Liberty.

We haven’t yet located a copy of the alleged memo, and so we’re not sure we believe this explosive claim. But – given that Israel (1) used unmarked jets and ships, (2) destroyed the Liberty’s communication equipment and then jammed the Liberty’s emergency distress channel, and (3) destroyed all liferafts – the logical inference is that Israel intended to frame Egypt for the attack, and didn’t want the Liberty’s crew to be able to tell the world what really happened.

The following must-watch documentaries from the BBC, Al Jazeera and an independent producer provide first-hand interviews with the crew of the USS Liberty which prove that this was a failed false flag attack:

False Flag News: Joint Base Andrews Locked Down After “Exercise” Mistaken for Real Event

BadTVFalse Flag News: Joint Base Andrews Locked Down After “Exercise” Mistaken for Real Event

A training exercise at Joint Base Andrews yesterday went haywire when someone mistook a routine inspection for an active shooter event and the base went into lockdown. Within minutes, the repeaters of the mockingbird media were reporting it as an active shooter event. And they wonder why “conspiracy theorists” insist on pointing out the overlaps between drills and real world events…