By Jack Allen: A pictures speaks a thousand words. Serial Liar and Serial Drone Killer Obama with horns
What can you say but they suit him! He lied about being anti-war to get the left behind him to get placed in The White House (with the help of his Globalist Puppet Masters), now he has a war lust that should scare any reasonable person to the point of running out and buying a bomb shelter. We live in scary times where wrong is considered right and right is considered wrong. Is Obama the anti-Christ? What do you think? Murder, lies and manipulations is all Obama knows. He will lie and do so even when he knows everyone knows it is a lie. He continues to get away with it. Why? Something very sinister must be protecting him in my opinion.
Tags: Anti-Christ Obama, Obama With Horns, Demon Obama, Serial Drone Killer Obama
Opinion By Jack Allen: They have used cartoons for war propaganda, they use cartoons to push junk food and junk products, they use cartoons to push a population controlling homosexual lifestyle, they use cartoons to make kids do dumb things in general, so I guess the Globalist Illuminati World Master Want-To-Be Nuts are not smart enough to use cartoons to push their agendas. Mark Dice should change his name to Yo Yo Boy. So they use movies, music, TV, articles, news to push the Globalist Agenda but never a cartoon. Crazy, what’s your opinion?
More From: Mark Dice
Video: Family Guy – Robin Williams Episode (Season 10 Episode 22)
More From: Family Guy
Tags: Offbeat, Family Guy, Robin Williams, Illuminati
THE ERA OF CHIMERAS: SCIENTISTS FEARLESSLY CREATE BIZARRE HUMAN/ANIMAL HYBRIDS
Did you know that scientists are creating cow/human hybrids, pig/human hybrids and even mouse/human hybrids? This is happening every single day in labs all over the western world, but most people have never even heard about it.
So would you drink milk from a cow/human hybrid that produces milk that is almost identical to human breast milk? And how would you interact with a mouse that has a brain that is almost entirely human? These are the kinds of questions that we will have to start to address as a society as scientists create increasingly bizarre human/animal hybrids. Thanks to dramatic advances in genetic technology, we have gotten to the point where it is literally possible for college students to create new hybrid lifeforms in their basements. Of course our laws have not kept pace with these advances, and now that Pandora’s Box has been opened, it is going to be nearly impossible to shut it.
byMICHAEL SNYDER – Scientists try to justify the creation of human/animal hybrids by telling us that it will help “cure disease” and help “end world hunger”, but what if scientists discover that combining human DNA with animal DNA can give us incredible new abilities or greatly extended lifespans? Will humanity really have the restraint to keep from going down that road?
And once animal DNA gets into our breeding pool, how will we ever put the genie back into the bottle? As the DNA of the human race becomes corrupted, it is easy to imagine a future where there are very few “pure humans” remaining.
Sadly, most of the scientists working in this field express very little concern for these types of considerations. In fact, one very prominent U.S. geneticist says that we should not even worry about hybridization because he believes that humans were originally pig/chimpanzee hybrids anyway…
The human species began as the hybrid offspring of a male pig and a female chimpanzee, an American geneticist has suggested.
The startling claim has been made by Eugene McCarthy, who is also one of the world’s leading authorities on hybridization in animals.
He points out that while humans have many features in common with chimps, we also have a large number of distinguishing characteristics not found in any other primates.
So if we are just hybrid creatures ourselves, why should we be scared of making more hybrids?
From their point of view, it all makes perfect sense.
And right now, extremely weird human/animal hybrids are being grown all over the United States.
For example, just check out the following excerpt from an NBC News article about what is going on in Nevada…
On a farm about six miles outside this gambling town, Jason Chamberlain looks over a flock of about 50 smelly sheep, many of them possessingpartially human livers, hearts, brains and other organs.
The University of Nevada-Reno researcher talks matter-of-factly about his plans to euthanize one of the pregnant sheep in a nearby lab. He can’t wait to examine the effects of the human cells he had injected into the fetus’ brain about two months ago.
“It’s mice on a large scale,” Chamberlain says with a shrug.
When this article came across my desk recently, I noted that it was almost ten years old.
Over the past decade, things have gotten much, much stranger.
Scientists have created genetically-engineered mice with artificial human chromosomes in every cell of their bodies, as part of a series of studies showing that it may be possible to treat genetic diseases with a radically new form of gene therapy.
In one of the unpublished studies, researchers made a human artificial chromosome in the laboratory from chemical building blocks rather than chipping away at an existing human chromosome, indicating the increasingly powerful technology behind the new field of synthetic biology.
And researchers at the University of Wisconsin figured out a way to transfer cells from human embryos into the brains of mice. When those cells from the human embryos began to grow and develop, they actually made the mice substantially smarter…
Yet experiments like these are going forward just the same. In just the past few months, scientists at the University of Wisconsin and the University of Rochester have published data on their human-animal neural chimeras. For the Wisconsin study, researchers injected mice with an immunotoxin to destroy a part of their brains–the hippocampus–that’s associated with learning, memory, and spatial reasoning. Then the researchers replaced those damaged cells with cells derived from human embryos. The cells proliferated and the lab chimeras recovered their ability to navigate a water maze.
For the Rochester study, researchers implanted newborn mice with nascent human glial cells, which help support and nourish neurons in the brain.Six months later, the human parts had elbowed out the mouse equivalents, and the animals had enhanced ability to solve a simple maze and learn conditioned cues. These protocols might run afoul of the anti-hybrid laws, and perhaps they should arouse some questions. These chimeric mice may not be human, or even really human, but they’re certainly one step further down the path to Algernon. It may not be so long before we’re faced with some hairy bioethics: What rights should we assign to mice with human brains?
So what should we call mice that have brains that are mostly human?
And at what point would our relationship with such creatures fundamentally change?
When they learn to talk?
Scientists all over the planet are recklessly creating these chimeras without really thinking through the implications.
In China, scientists have actually inserted human genes into the DNA of dairy cow embryos.
As technology continues to advance, the possibilities are going to be endless.
One professor at Harvard even wants to create a Neanderthal/human hybrid. He says that he just needs an “adventurous female human” to carry the child…
Professor George Church of Harvard Medical School believes he can reconstruct Neanderthal DNA and resurrect the species which became extinct 33,000 years ago.
His scheme is reminiscent of Jurassic Park but, while in the film dinosaurs were created in a laboratory, Professor Church’s ambitious plan requires a human volunteer.
He said his analysis of Neanderthal genetic code using samples from bones is complete enough to reconstruct their DNA.
He said: ‘Now I need an adventurous female human.
‘It depends on a hell of a lot of things, but I think it can be done.’
I don’t know about you, but that sounds like a really, really bad idea to me.
And right now, the U.S. federal government is actually considering a plan which would allow scientists to create babies that come from genetic material drawn from three parents…
A new technology aimed at eliminating genetic disease in newborns would combine the DNA of three people, instead of just two, to create a child, potentially redrawing ethical lines for designer babies.
The process works by replacing potentially variant DNA in the unfertilized eggs of a hopeful mother with disease-free genes from a donor. U.S. regulators today will begin weighing whether the procedure, used only in monkeys so far, is safe enough to be tested in humans.
Because the process would change only a small, specific part of genetic code, scientists say a baby would largely retain the physical characteristics of the parents. Still, DNA from all three — mother, father and donor — would remain with the child throughout a lifetime, opening questions about long-term effects for this generation, and potentially the next. Ethicists worry that allowing pre-birth gene manipulation may one day lead to build-to-order designer babies.
Many scientists believe that these kinds of technologies will “change the world”.
They might be more right about that than they ever could possibly imagine.
When we start monkeying with human DNA, we could be opening up doorways that we never even knew existed.
If we do not learn from history, we are doomed to repeat it. Hopefully scientists around the globe will understand the dangers of these types of experiments before it is too late.
Nostradamus wrote that a comet will come from Cancer, ‘Brighter than a full moon’: The biggest star of the year…
A comet sighting in our times is key to identifying the third of three Antichrists foreseen by the prophet. In each case, Nostradamus provided clues that reverberated in similar phrases in a number of quatrains scattered throughout his book of prophecies for the fleet sooth-sleuth-sayer to decant for debate and discussion.
Nostradamus predicts the war of the Third Antichrist
Nostradamus predicts the war of the Third Antichrist will be the longest of the three. Napoleon’s war, as Nostradamus accurately predicted in 7 Q13, lasted 14 years (1799–1814), followed by another famous time prediction in 10 Q90 for Napoleon’s escape from exile on Elba in 1815 to lead France for a hundred days until his final defeat at Waterloo.
Nostradamus did not tag a specific length to Hitler’s war but he left powerful clues accurately framing the war in time. In his Epistle prophecies he earmarked the years “(19)37″, “(19)41″ and “(19)45″ as the beginning, middle and end of the conflict.
He was only slightly off on the beginning year–it was 1939–but 1941 did see the turning of the tide with the Second Antichrist’s disastrous invasion of Russia, started on the same day of the 129 year anniversary of the First Antichrist’s invasion, no less. Hitler’s war did end in 1945
Nostradamus gives two predictions for the length of the war of the Third Antichrist. In a passage written in 1558 about the three Antichrists in his Epistle to Henry II, he said the following:
“Finally the third [Antichrist] will cause an inundation of human blood, and one will not find Mars [the God of War] fasting for a long time… After that, the Antichrist will be the infernal prince again for the (third and) last time.
All the Kingdoms of Christianity, and even those of the infidels [Muslims], will tremble for the space of twenty-five years…” “Mabus” will soon die, then will come, A horrible undoing of people and animals, At once one will see vengeance, One hundred hands (powers) thirst, famine, when the comet will pass.”
That means: War World 3 — Nuclear Weapons — Disaster all over the world. Nostradamus in the Epistle warns of much worse to come in the new war.
Video: Nostradamus (1994)
He predicted WWII, the deaths of U.S. presidents, and the turmoil of the 1960s. He prophesied that Israel would become a state 15 years before the event and foretold the Great Depression. Many of his visions seemed to pass unfulfilled, but are now being proven accurate.
His name is Edgar Cayce, and he is sometimes called the other Nostradamus. Throughout the 1930s and ’40s, Cayce was a well-known figure, renowned for his “healing abilities” as well as his prophecies.
Decoding the Past examines the transcriptions of Cayce’s readings to see which of his predictions have come true, which remain unfulfilled, and which may yet be realized.
Michel de Nostredame (14 or 21 December 1503 — 2 July 1566), usually Latinized as Nostradamus, was a French apothecary and reputed seer who published collections of prophecies that have since become famous worldwide. He is best known for his book Les Propheties, the first edition of which appeared in 1555. Since the publication of this book, which has rarely been out of print since his death, Nostradamus has attracted a following that, along with much of the popular press, credits him with predicting many major world events.
Most academic sources maintain that the associations made between world events and Nostradamus’s quatrains are largely the result of misinterpretations or mistranslations (sometimes deliberate) or else are so tenuous as to render them useless as evidence of any genuine predictive power. Nevertheless, occasional commentators have successfully used a process of free interpretation and determined ‘twisting’ of his words to predict an apparently imminent event. In 1867, three years before it happened, for example, Le Pelletier did so to anticipate either the triumph or the defeat of Napoleon III in a war that, in the event, begged to be identified as the Franco-Prussian war, while admitting that he could not specify either which or when.
Tags: Nostradamus, Prophecy, War, WW3, World War, Future
Child Sacrifice Goes Mainstream, Fresh Blood For The Vampire People Just when you think occult imagery couldn’t get more in your face, a new “science” proves what vampires and satanists have been saying for years; blood from the young is the…
Miley Cyrus’ Illuminati Puppet Master Exposed! His Name is Terry Richardson!!!!! MUST SEE!!
More Scandal Below
Obama Had Senate-Office ‘Portrait Session’ With Pornographer
WARNING: Some of the images and language in this story are sexually graphic and disturbing.
Obama Had Senate-Office ‘Portrait Session’ With Pornographer
(CNSNews.com) — On June 20, 2007, then-Sen. Barack Obama (D.-Ill.), who was seeking the Democratic presidential nomination at the time, hosted a “portrait session” in his U.S. Senate office where he posed for and with Terry Richardson, a man already well-known, as the flyleaf of a coffee-table collection of his work put it, as the photographer who “took 1970s porn esthetic and made it fashion chic.”
“Who uses his fashion money to fund an X-rated website? Yes, Richardson,” said the flyleaf to the 2004 book Terryworld, published by Taschen Books.
“And who can’t resist getting his clothes off and jumping in front of his own lens? Well, that would be Terry Richardson as well,” said the flyleaf. “Welcome to ‘Terryworld,’ the land restraint forgot. Porn stars, super models, transsexuals, hillbillies, friends, pets and celebrities all do for his lens what they’ll do for no other. And if any of them later wonder why they did it, just blame it on ‘Terryworld,’ where taboos are null and void, and fashion finds sex a perfect fit.”
The book itself includes photos of oral sex; a nude model wearing a “slut” crown riding a bike; a young man appearing to hang by a belt from a door; models urinating in the snow; a young woman with a large gold ball stuffed into her vagina; naked models with bags over their heads or their eyes darkened; a man with a toothbrush in his rectum; and Richardson with his teeth on a tampon string while it is inside a model’s vagina.
It also includes a photo of an apparently naked Richardson engaging in some kind of physical contact with a sheep.
Olivier Zahm, the Parisian editor of Purple magazine, says in the book, “Let’s be honest. Terry’s pictures are definitely not feminist. They are as politically ‘incorrect’ as pictures get. He is not glamorizing women’s power, beauty or strength. He is more portraying female beauty from a male perspective.”
In the book’s introduction, written by Dian Hanson, Richardson is quoted as saying, “People in fashion were saying, ‘If I see one more picture of a girl with her legs spread… He’s a misogynist, he’s a porn guy.’ So hey, I’ll spread my legs too. I’ll be the object. The thought of people masturbating to me, or to pictures I take, is great. That’s a wonderful inspiration to give someone.”
Obama’s “portrait session” with Richardson in the Hart Senate Office Building was set up for Vibe magazine, which ran some of Richardson’s photos of Obama along with the cover article for its September 2007 issue. One of these photos showed Richardson and Obama shaking hands, smiling—and each giving a thumbs-up sign to the camera, which Richardson regularly does with his models. (Richardson later posted that same photo on his own website after Obama was reelected in November 2012.)
Writer Jeff Chang, who authored the September 2007 Vibe cover story, interviewed Obama at his Senate office on May 23, 2007, but the photo shoot did not take place then.
In an August 8, 2007 interview with National Public Radio, Vibe editor Danyel Smith described how elated she was when the magazine was able to follow-up on Chang’s interview by scheduling Terry Richardson’s photo session with Obama at Obama’s Senate office.
Smith explained that the magazine’s desire to feature Obama was part of its “coverage of what we call leadership issues in the country.”
“And so we just started thinking, what about Obama?” Smith told NPR. “What does he mean to our readership? And we just said we were going to go for it. We didn’t know if we could get it, if he’d be interested in it. But it was when we got the interview we were really excited. But when we got the portrait session, that’s when we were pretty much jumping up and down. And it’s been a fantastic experience.”
“Well, the pictures are kind of spicy,” said NPR’s Michel Martin. “But what was it about the photos that took it over the top for you?”
“We were in the senator’s offices down in Washington, D.C., and we were trying to get him to loosen up,” said Smith.
“But, yeah, it was just great,” Smith continued. “Terry Richardson, who shot the photos, and Robin Forest, our photo editor, they got him to look at his watch. This is something that we wanted to do. There’s a thing in hip-hop music where, you know, is it time? It’s time. Looking at my Gucci, it’s about that time. What time is it? There’s always a sort of cool thing related to the sort of looking at your watch like you have somewhere to go. And since one of his campaign slogans is it’s Obama’s time–his supporters tend to hold those placards up–we just wanted that headline.”
Robin Harmon, who was credited by Vibe as the groomer for the Obama-Richardson photo shoot, confirmed to CNSNews.com that it took place in Obama’s Senate offices.
Vibe’s September 2007 issue used six of the photos Richardson took of Obama that day. The magazine had two versions with different covers. One cover featured Obama with his tie loosened and his jacket off, looking at his watch. The other featured a more serious Obama, with his tie tightened and his jacket on.
The table-of-contents page featured a photo of Obama rolling up his left sleeve; another page featured a photo of Obama and Richardson together, smiling, shaking hands and holding their thumbs up.The article itself included a close-up of Obama’s face and a photo of Obama smiling and with his hands in his pockets.
The headline for the article was: “Ladies and Gentlemen, (Is This) the Next President of the United States (?).” It also included the sub-head: “Photographed by Terry Richardson on June 20, 2007 in Washington, D.C.”
Did Obama, his Senate staff, or his campaign staff know about Richardson’s reputation as the man who took the “porn esthetic and made it fashion chic” when Obama invited him into his office for the June 20, 2007 photo shoot?
A quick Lexis-Nexis search at the time would have turned up multiple items warning of the graphic nature of Richardson’s work.
For example, a week before Richardson showed up at the Hart Senate Office Building to do his portrait session with Obama, Penthouse magazine put out a press release announcing that its July issue would have a “redesigned centerfold” that featured a perforation, making it easier to rip out of the magazine.
“Our readers don’t necessarily want to cut to the chase,” said this June 13 announcement from Penthouse. “This new perforated centerfold is a great and natural addition to the magazine and we are honored that the debut centerfold was photographed by one of today’s best photographers, Terry Richardson.”
The Sept. 10, 2006 edition of the Sunday Mail (South Australia) reported, “A new national advertising campaign portraying childlike young women in sexually explicit poses has outraged childhood and family groups. The Lee Jeans advertisements suggest prostitution, pornography and oral sex and the models involved, although aged in their 20s, appear to be much younger. Australian Childhood Foundation chief executive officer Dr. Joe Tucci said the pictures were a ‘horrific’ representation of young people in sexually explicit poses. He called on the Advertising Standards Bureau to ban the billboard and magazine advertisements, shot by American photographer Terry Richardson.”
The July 15, 2006, Sydney Morning Heraldreported, “If you subscribe to the theory that sex sells in advertising, Terry Richardson is definitely your man. Best known for louche imagery that blurs the lines between photography and pornography, the 41-year-old American coaxes models into his studio to strike poses that no doubt shock their parents.”
When the Terryworld book was published in 2004, Richardson also had an art exhibit entitled “Terrywood” in New York City. The Observer magazine ran a coverstory on the exhibit on Oct. 17, 2004. The headline: “Good Clean Fun? He’s the former junkie punk who put the filth into fashion. Now, alongside his X-rated ad campaigns and sleazy shoots for glossy magazines, photographer Terry Richardson wants his art to be taken seriously.”
“His name is Terry Richardson, and the whole show consists of self-made images of Terry thrusting, rucking, prodding, pumping and, sometimes, grinning at the camera like a nerd let loose in porno heaven,” said the article. “‘Terryworld’ is a strange and contradictory place where art and fashion and pornography converge, and where, for the time being at least, pornography is the dominant aesthetic.”
“The girls who now come knocking on the door of Terry Richardson’s studio to take part in what he calls his ‘spontaneous sex acts‘ may be young or impressionable, exhibitionist or insecure, or all of the above, but they are all too eager and willing to perform for his camera,” says the article.
So, did Obama or his staff know about this?
Jeff Chang wrote in the September 2007 Vibe article that when he interviewed Obama in his Senate office on May 23—a month before the Terry Richardson photo shoot—he dealt with Obama’s then-press secretary Ben LaBolt.
“Behind closed doors, aides are working feverishly on a major lobbying-/ethics-reform bill the senator has sponsored,” wrote Chang. “Ben LaBolt, Obama’s press secretary, says, sighing, ‘These are the days my coffeepot is full all day.’”
At the time of the June 20, 2007 Richardson photo shoot, LaBolt was still Obama’s senatorial press secretary, but later that year would become a spokesman for Obama’s presidential campaign.LaBolt now works at The Incite Agency with former White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs.
CNSNews.com contacted LaBolt by voicemail and e-mail and asked him if then-Sen. Obama’s presidential campaign or Senate staff was familiar with Terry Richardson’s reputation for “porn esthetic” photography before the 2007 “portrait session” in Obama’s Senate office. CNSNews.com also asked if LaBolt believes Richardon’s photography degrades women, and whether he believes, given the way Richardson presents women, Obama should express regret for having given credibility to Richardson by posing with him. LaBolt did not respond.
CNSNews.com put the same questions via e-mail to David Axelrod, who was Obama’s chief presidential campaign strategist at the time of the Richardson photo shoot. Tim Skoczek at Axelrod Strategies emailed a response on Axelrod’s behalf. Skoczek said, “I appreciate your reaching out and giving David the opportunity to speak for your piece, but he has no comment.”
CNSNews.com also sent the following questions to White House Press Secretary Jay Carney:
1) Was then-Sen. Obama’s presidential campaign or Senate staff familiar with Terry Richardson reputation for “porn chic” photography before they scheduled Obama’s 2007 “portrait session” with Richardson? If not, why not?
2) Does President Obama regret that the campaign let that “portrait session” take place?
3) Does President Obama believe that Terry Richardson’s photography degrades women?
4) Given the credibility he helped give to Richardson by posing for and with him, do you believe President Obama should express regret for having done so given the sexually graphic nature of Richardson’s photography and the way he presents women?
Despite several phone calls and e-mails over the course of four days, the White House did not respond.
CNSNews.com also tried to contact Terry Richardson for comment but he did not respond.
According to a March 2, 2012 article in The New York Times, Richardson stopped giving interviews in 2010, saying that his work should “speak for itself.”
Michael W. Chapman contributed to this report.
Tags: Obama’s Scandals, Frank Marshall Davis, Terry Richardson, Barack Obama, Porno, Satanic, Bill Ayers, Sheep-Violating, Pornographer, Miley Cyrus, Illuminati
The Department of Defense has been conducting training exercises in several cities in Arizona in preparation for “urban operations,” unbeknownst to its citizens.
“Right now the military is in the middle of a big training exercise over Phoenix for the second night in a row. People are calling the 3TV News room wondering what’s happening,” claimed the 3TV news anchor.
Phoenix residents were so alarmed to hear swarms of military helicopters flying overhead that they phoned their local news outlet to ask if they had somehow crossed over into a warzone.
“They were very close to the buildings,” one witness told 3TV News. “…they would go back up and they would take off and just fly and then they would stop and then go again.” The interviewee was unable to tell what type of helicopters were used as the exercises were conducted under cover of night.
Phoenix PD confirmed to 3TV News that the DoD was indeed conducting training exercises “trying to get military personnel certified in urban operations so that when they go overseas they are prepared.”
That the military owns plenty of abandoned buildings and mock towns for training purposes was not questioned by local news.
AsInfowarshasexhaustively documented, military exercises are routinely conducted in residential and urban areas as a way to acclimate citizens into accepting a constant military presence in lieu of local law enforcement, and in order to soften the gradual dissolving of posse comitatus, the law that supposedly bars federal military personnel from enforcing state laws.
In Alex Jones’ film Police State 2000, Alex exposed several federal drills that took place in Texas in total disregard of public safety and without express permission from local law enforcement. Alex also details how Russian troops were allowed to join in on terrorizing the public.
KTVK says other Arizona cities should expect military helicopters in the near future, as locations in Glendale, Scottsdale, Mesa, and Tempe have also been chosen as training grounds.
Tags: Police State, Big Brother, News, Military Exercises,